Table of Contents



 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

 

Filed by the Registrant☒                            Registrant ☒

Filed by a Partyparty other than the Registrant☐Registrant ☐

 

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)14a‑6(e)(2))

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12under §240.14a‑12

  

NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY


(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) 

 


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Thanother than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

No fee required.

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)14a‑6(i)(1) and 0-11.0‑11

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-110‑11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 


 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)0‑11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the formForm or scheduleSchedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

Amount previously paid:Previously Paid:

 

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

 

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

logo.jpg

 

 

 

April 18, 201612, 2021

 

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

 

You are cordially invited to attend the 20162021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We will hold our meetingShareholders (“Annual Meeting”) on Thursday, June 2, 2016,10, 2021, at 8:7:00 a.m. Pacific TimeTime. As part of our effort to encourage broader participation in the Annual Meeting, as well as maintain a safe and healthy environment for our directors, members of management, and shareholders in light of the coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID‑19”) pandemic, the Board of Directors has determined that this year’s Annual Meeting will be conducted virtually via webcast instead of in-person. You will be able to attend the meeting, vote your shares, and submit questions by logging in at the Hilton Vancouver Hotel, located at 301 West 6th Street, Vancouver, Washington.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NWPX2021.

 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. As a shareholder of Northwest Pipe Company, you can play an important role in our Company by considering and taking action on the matters set forth in the attached Proxy Statement. We appreciate the time and attention you invest in making thoughtful decisions.

 

Thank you for your support and continued interest in Northwest Pipe Company.

 

Sincerely,

sig1.jpg

 

Scott Montross

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

logo.jpg

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 


To the Shareholders of Northwest Pipe Company:

 

The 20162021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Northwest Pipe Company (the “Company”) will be held via webcast on Thursday, June 2, 2016,10, 2021, at 8:7:00 a.m. Pacific TimeTime. While there will be no physical location, shareholders may attend and participate in the Annual Meeting virtually by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NWPX2021. To participate in the Hilton Vancouver Hotel, located at 301 West 6th Street, Vancouver, Washington. Annual Meeting, you will need your unique 16‑digit control number printed in the box and marked by the arrow on your proxy card or on the voting instructions from your stockbroker, bank, or other nominee that accompanied your proxy materials.

The purposes of the Annual Meeting will be:

 

 

1.

To elect twothree directors, each to serve for a three-year term;

 

 

2.

To hold an advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation;

 

 

3.

To ratify the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as the Company'sCompany’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016;2021; and

 

 

4.

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

 

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on April 15, 20169, 2021 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the Meeting.meeting.

 

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the meeting. Please complete, sign, and return your proxy card, or use the Internet or telephone voting systems.

 

We are enclosing a copy of the 2015Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (“2020 Annual Report to ShareholdersShareholders”) with this Notice and Proxy Statement.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

sig1.jpg

 

Scott Montross

President and Chief Executive Officer

Vancouver, Washington
April 18, 2016

Vancouver, Washington

April 12, 2021

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNEJUNE 2, 201610, 2021::

 

ThisProxyStatement Proxy Statement and the Company’s 201Company5s 2020 Annual Report to Shareholders are also available at

https://materials.proxyvote.com/667746

 


PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE

2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF

NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  

Our Company

Northwest Pipe Company is a leading manufacturer for water related infrastructure products. In addition to being the largest manufacturer of engineered steel water pipeline systems in North America, we produce high-quality precast and reinforced concrete products, Permalok® steel casing pipe, bar-wrapped concrete cylinder pipe, as well as linings, coatings, joints, and one of the largest offerings of fittings and specialized components. Our ten manufacturing facilities are strategically positioned to meet growing water and wastewater infrastructure needs. We provide solution-based products for a wide range of markets including water transmission and infrastructure, water and wastewater plant piping, structural stormwater and sewer systems, trenchless technology, and pipeline rehabilitation. Our prominent position is based on a widely-recognized reputation for quality, service, and manufacturing to meet performance expectations in all categories including highly-corrosive environments.

Following the divestiture of the Tubular Products business in late 2017, we worked to stabilize the financial condition of Northwest Pipe Company through a strong focus on working capital management and various cost reduction initiatives. The culmination of these efforts helped propel our growth, with the acquisition of Ameron Water Transmission Group, LLC in July 2018 and Geneva Pipe and Precast Company in January 2020, to become a 900+ employee-strong company. This strategic growth came not just from manufacturing top-quality water infrastructure products, but from investing in our workforce, health and safety programs, social initiatives, and improvements to our environmental stewardship.

Our Culture

Our core values are Accountability, Commitment, and Teamwork, or ACT for short, which we seek to demonstrate in all of our behaviors and daily interactions, both internally and externally, with all of our stakeholders.

img01.jpg

Ethics and Compliance

We take pride in the high standards of conduct that we identify with as a company. We have controls in place relating to compliance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code”), including a requirement for employees and the Board of Directors to review and understand the requirements of our Code, as well as an established whistleblower hotline and related procedures.

We conduct training on our Code upon hire, and in regular intervals during the employee’s life cycle with us. The most recent ethics training for all salaried employees was conducted in the fourth quarter of 2019.

img08.jpg


Health and Safety

Our goal is to send each employee home safe at the end of the day. Safety is at the core of our culture and infused at every level of our organization. More than just policy and procedure, our safety program gives equal focus to the human side of safety, integrating coaching and mentoring efforts with compliance-driven approaches. By instilling a deep commitment to safety that starts with our CEO and reaches out to the apprentice on the manufacturing floor, we have achieved industry-leading safety performance. Over the last four years, our average total recordable incident rate was 2.31 and our average days away rate was 0.56 including our newly acquired facilities, calculated in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s record keeping requirements.

img02.jpg

We are very proud that two of our 10 facilities exceed one million work hours without a lost time accident. The Saginaw and Portland facilities achieved this important milestone and all other steel pipe facilities exceed one year since their last lost time accident. This commendable result is a testament to our ACT culture. Additionally, the integration of our safety culture has been critical to our two successful acquisitions in the past three years, and we expect to experience improved safety performance rates at these acquired facilities, especially as COVID‑19 travel restrictions are lifting and we are able to work with these facilities in-person.

img03.jpg

As a manufacturer, we work hard to eliminate hazards associated with high-risk work and focus on personal safety issues, such as complacency and fatigue. However, we believe the key to our success is through direct engagement with employees. Employees work collaboratively with management within Process Improvement Teams to keep continuous improvement in safety as the most important thing we do. We continue to focus on keeping our employees healthy during the COVID‑19 pandemic by taking proactive and precautionary steps to ensure the safety of our employees. Increased safety measures include frequent cleaning and disinfection of workspaces, providing personal protective equipment, instituting social distancing measures, and offering remote working environments for some employees.

For more detail on our safety culture, please visit our website at https://www.nwpipe.com/about/culture/safety/.

A Plant Safety Coordinator recognizes

one of our team members for enforcing

safety protocols.

 

img08.jpg


Employee Wellness

Historically, the U.S. manufacturing industry has been known for subpar mental health support. Northwest Pipe Company is dedicated to bucking this trend with a robust benefits program prioritizing the physical and mental wellbeing of our team. On top of mental health services covered by our medical insurance plans, we have a comprehensive Employee Assistance Program (“EAP”) in place to help our team members navigate times of crisis and support everyday wellness. Available to all employees, dependents, and household family members, EAP services include confidential counseling for issues such as stress, burnout, depression, anxiety, relationship and family issues; work/life balance services; legal assistance; financial coaching; discounted gym memberships and nutrition counseling; and access to an EAP member site with additional resources available 24/7. By encouraging healthy habits and active lifestyles, these services support the overall well-being of our employees. This translates to healthier, happier team members bringing their best selves—and best performance—to work.

Diversity and Inclusion

Diversity and inclusion are integral to our employee experience, and we are proud of our diverse workforce. Companies that are diverse in age, gender identity, race, sexual orientation, physical or mental ability, ethnicity, and perspective are shown to be more resilient. At Northwest Pipe Company, we value our differences as strengths and believe our success and achievements as a company culminate from each individual’s unique background, perspective, talents, and skillset. A diverse workforce and inclusive working environment are the foundation for building the most effective, high performing teams within our ACT culture.

Our Affirmative Action Program (“AAP”) strives to hire, recruit, train, and promote employees without regard to race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, national origin, disability, or veteran’s status. We only hire employees who meet the necessary education, training, skills and/or experience requirements to perform their job, and who can provide required documentation pertaining to legal eligibility and age requirements. To support these efforts, the AAP for our United States facilities is reviewed annually by a third-party consultant, establishing annual hiring goals for women, minorities, veterans, and individuals with disabilities.

img04.jpg
img08.jpg


Setting Intentions

As a company that values our diverse workforce, we set a high standard for our inclusive and equitable workplace, and we continually assess our current standing and set specific aspirations. We hold ourselves accountable for creating an environment where everyone can learn, grow, and thrive.

img05.jpg

Environmental Stewardship

As a manufacturer of water related infrastructure products, we have the privilege of bringing water to communities and improving livability. Water is an equalizer that drives a population’s health, individual growth, and prosperity. Water is a precious natural resource that requires careful handling to ensure a balance of community access and environmental sustainability.

With climate change disrupting weather patterns and causing long-term drought in regions where water has previously been more available, responsible resource management and reliable water transmission solutions are becoming even more crucial. Our quality and long-lasting engineered steel pipe products support critical modernization projects that replace or rehabilitate crumbling, aging infrastructure, reducing water loss and saving millions of gallons of water a year.

img08.jpg


img06.jpg

As a company, we invest in improvements that not only make our manufacturing more efficient, but also prove to be less harmful to the environment. We continue to invest in enhancements in our coating and lining processing that improves particulate release and reduces emissions well below the related environmental standards. In addition to building expansions and upgrades, we also upgraded the lighting in many of our facilities to become brighter and more energy efficient, creating cost savings on utility expenses while increasing visibility for a safer working environment.

As a manufacturer, we strive to comply with environmental laws and regulations while minimizing waste. We recognize the importance of treating our natural resources with the greatest respect, so that they are available to future generations.

A recent energy saving upgrade at our Portland facility not only reduces our

energy output but also provides a safer work environment. Before and after

photo provided by EC Electric.

img08.jpg


PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE

2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF

NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Introduction

1

Corporate Governance

2

Director Elections

2

Director Independence

2

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

2

Board of Directors Meetings

3

Board of Directors MeetingsCommittees

3

Board of Directors CommitteesAudit Committee

3

AuditCompensation Committee

4

CompensationNominating and Governance Committee

4

NominatingDirector Qualifications and Governance CommitteeDiversity

4

Communications with Directors

4

Nominations by Shareholders

4

Proposal No.1 Election of Directors

5

Nominations by Shareholders

5

Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors

6

Information as to Nominees and Continuing Directors

5

Nominees for Director

5

Continuing Directors

6

Nominees for DirectorExecutive Compensation

68

Continuing DirectorsCompensation Discussion and Analysis

78

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

8

Process for Setting Executive Compensation

8

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

9

Elements of Compensation Discussion and Analysis

9

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

9

Process for Setting Executive Compensation

10

Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationRealized Pay vs. Reported Pay

11

Elements of CompensationBase Salary

11

Realized Pay vs. Reported PayPerformance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation

11

Discretionary Incentive Compensation

12

Equity Incentive Awards

12

Retirement Benefits

13

Base SalaryPerquisites and Other Personal Benefits

13

Performance-Based Cash IncentiveExecutive Compensation and Risk

13

Discretionary Incentive CompensationClawback Provisions

1413

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

14

Retirement Benefits

15

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

16

Executive Compensation and Risk

16

Clawback Provisions

16

Stock Ownership and Anti-Hedging/Pledging Policy

1713

Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation

14

2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

15

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year End

16

2020 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

17

2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards2020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

17

Employment Agreements

18

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2015 Fiscal Year EndChange in Control Agreements

18

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

19

2015 Option ExercisesPay Ratio Disclosure

19

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Stock VestingInsider Participation

19

Compensation Committee Report

20


Page

2015 Nonqualified DeferredProposal No.2 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

21

Employment AgreementsDirector Compensation

21


Page

Change in Control Agreements

2122

Director Compensation Table

22

Audit Committee Interlocks and Insider ParticipationReport

23

Compensation Committee Report

24

Proposal No. 2 Advisory Vote on Executive CompensationIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

25

Director Compensation

26

Director Compensation Table

26

Audit Committee Report

28

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

30

Disclosure of Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

3025

Pre-approval Process

3025

Proposal No.3 Ratification of the Appointment of Moss AdamsLLP

3126

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

3327

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting ComplianceReports

3327

Stock Owned by Management and Principal Shareholders

3428

Date for Submission of Shareholder Proposals

3629

Other Matters

3629

Questions and Answers About the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting

3730

Additional Information

4335

 

 

 

NORTHWEST PIPE COMPANY

5721 SE Columbia Way,201NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 200 100

Vancouver, Washington 9866198684

(360) 397-6250360-397-6250

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 2, 2016


INTRODUCTION10, 2021

 


INTRODUCTION

This Proxy Statement and the accompanying 2015Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2020 (“2020 Annual Report to ShareholdersShareholders”), as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) are being furnished to the shareholders of Northwest Pipe Company, an Oregon corporation (the “Company”), as part of the solicitation of proxies by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors”) for use at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Thursday, June 2, 201610, 2021 at 8:7:00 a.m. Pacific TimeTime. While there will be no physical location, shareholders may attend and participate in the Annual Meeting virtually by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NWPX2021. To participate in the Hilton Vancouver Hotel, locatedAnnual Meeting, you will need your unique 16‑digit control number printed in the box and marked by the arrow on your proxy card or on the voting instructions from your stockbroker, bank, or other nominee that accompanied your proxy materials. Access to the webcast will open approximately fifteen minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting to allow time for you to log in and test your computer audio system. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time. For additional information about participating in this year’s virtual Annual Meeting, please see “Questions and Answers About the Proxy Materials and the Annual Meeting” starting at 301 West 6th Street, Vancouver, Washington.page 30.

 

At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will be asked to vote on the following matters:

 

 

1.

The election of twothree directors, each to serve for a three-year term;

 

 

2.

An advisory vote on the Company’s executive compensation;

 

 

3.

The ratification of the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016;2021; and

 

 

4.

Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.

 

This Proxy Statement, together with the enclosed proxy card and the 20152020 Annual Report to Shareholders, are first being mailed to shareholders of the Company on or about April 29, 2016.23, 2021.

 

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on April 15, 20169, 2021 as the record date for the determination of the shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Accordingly, only holders of record of shares of Common Stock at the close of business on such date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, with each such share entitling its owner to one vote on all matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, there were 9,573,3719,857,961 shares of Common Stock then outstanding, with each share of Common Stock being entitled to one vote.

 

If the enclosed form of proxy is properly executed and returned in time to be voted at the Annual Meeting, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the instructions marked thereon.Executed but unmarked proxies will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.

 

Shareholders who execute proxies retain the right to revoke them at any time prior to the exercise of the powers conferred thereby by filing a written notice of revocation with, or by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Northwest Pipe Company, 5721 SE Columbia Way,201 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 200,100, Vancouver, Washington 98661,98684, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.electronically during the virtual meeting. All valid, unrevoked proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting.

 

1


 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Our Board of Directors and management have committed themselves to establishing a strong corporate governance environment and to adopting the best practices to meet the needs and goals of the Company. As part of that commitment, we have adopted Corporate Governance Principles, which cover such topics as qualifications and independence of Board members, the selection, orientation, and continuing education of Board members, as well as other topics designed to promote effective governance by the Board of Directors. We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all employees, officers, and directors of the Company and sets forth guidance to help in recognizing and dealing with ethical issues, to provide mechanisms for reporting unethical conduct, and to promote a culture of honesty and accountability, and a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which applies to our senior financial officers and sets forth guidance to deter wrongdoing, and promote honest and ethical conduct, and to promote a culture of integrity and fairness. Copies of our Corporate Governance Principles, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers are available on the Company’s website atwww.nwpipe.com under “Investor Relations” - “Corporate Governance”, or by writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Northwest Pipe Company, 5721 SE Columbia Way,201 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 200,100, Vancouver, Washington 98661.98684.

 

We have also adopted a Policy for Reporting Financial Irregularities (“Whistleblower Policy”), which is intended to create a workplace environment that encourages the highest standards of ethical, moral, and legal business conduct. The Whistleblower Policy establishes procedures for any person to confidentially and anonymously report violations by us or any of our personnel of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or any laws, rules, or regulations without fear of retaliation. The Whistleblower Policy also contains procedures for submission of complaints involving our accounting practices and internal accounting controls.

 

Director Elections

 

While directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast, our Corporate Governance Principles include a director resignation policy, requiring a director who receives more votes “withheld” than in favor of election in an uncontested election to tender an offer of his or hertheir resignation to the Board of Directors for consideration. The Nominating and Governance Committee shall recommend to the Board of Directors the action to be taken with respect to such offer of resignation, and the Board of Directors shall promptly determine whether to accept such resignation, and shall publicly disclose its decision and rationale.

 

Director Independence

 

The current Board of Directors consists of sixseven directors, twoone of whom areis currently employed by the Company (Messrs. Montross and Roman)(Mr. Montross). Mr. Roman, Chairperson of the Board, was employed by the Company until September 30, 2018. The Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that all of the non-employeeother directors (Ms. ApplebaumKulesa and Messrs. Declusin, Demorest,Franson, Larson, Paschal, and Larson)Yearsley) are “independent” in accordance with the standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market, including standards related to independence for service on the committees on which they serve, and as defined by the director independence guidelines included in our Corporate Governance Principles.

 


Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

 

The Company’s Corporate Governance Principles provide that the independent members of the Board of Directors will select a lead director from among the independent directors if the positions of ChairmanChairperson of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) are held by the same person or if the ChairmanChairperson of the Board is not an independent director. The responsibilities of the ChairmanChairperson of the Board include the following: set Board meeting agendas in collaboration with the CEO; preside at Board meetings and the annual shareholders’ meeting; assign tasks to the appropriate committees;committees in accordance with their respective charters; and ensure that information flows openly between management and the Board.Board of Directors. The responsibilities of the lead director include the following: coordinate the activities of the independent directors; make recommendations to the CEO in setting Board meeting agendas on matters concerning the independent directors; prepare the agenda for executive sessions of the independent directors, chair those sessions, and be primarily responsible for communications between the independent directors and the CEO. RichardMr. Roman, the ChairmanChairperson of our Board of Directors, is not “independent” within the meaning of the applicable rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Accordingly, in December 2010, the remaining directors appointed James DeclusinMr. Franson remains as the Board’s Lead Director.Director since his appointment in August 2016.

2

 

The Board of Directors oversees management’s Company-wide risk management activities. Management’s risk management activities which include assessing and taking actions necessary to manage risks incurred in connection with the long-term strategic direction of the Company and the operation of our business. The Board of Directors uses its committees to assist in its risk oversight function. The Compensation Committee is responsible for oversight of risk associated with our compensation plans. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for oversight of board processes and corporate governance-related risk. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of our financial reporting process, financial internal controls and compliance activities, the qualification, independence, and performance of our independent auditors, and compliance with applicable legal and regulatory compliance requirements. The Compensation Committee is responsible for oversight of risk associated with our compensation plans. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for oversight of board processes and corporate governance-related risk. The Board of Directors maintains overall responsibility for oversight of the work of its various committees by having regular reports from the chairmanchairperson of each Committee with respect to the work performed by histheir respective Committee. In addition, discussions withby the Board of Directors about the Company’s strategic plan, financial results, capital structure, merger and acquisition related activity, and other business generally include discussion of the risks associated with the matters under consideration.

 

Board of Directors Meetings

 

Regular attendance at the Company’s Board meetings and the Annual Meeting is required of each director. The Board of Directors held five meetings during 2015.2020, in addition to adopting unanimous written consents in lieu of a meeting and soliciting informal Board consensus. Each of the directors attended more than 75% of the total number of Board and applicable Committee meetings during their tenure in 2015.2020. In addition, all of the directors serving at that time attended the Company’s 20152020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 

Board of Directors Committees

 

The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Governance Committee. Each of the Committees consists of independent directors and each of the Committees has adopted a written charter which is available on the Company’s website atwww.nwpipe.comwww.nwpipe.comunder “Investor Relations” - “Corporate Governance”,Governance,” or by writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Northwest Pipe Company, 5721 SE Columbia Way,201 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 200,100, Vancouver, Washington 98661.98684.


 

The table below lists the current membership of each Committee.

 

Audit
Committee

 

Compensation
Committee

 

Nominating
and
Governance
Committee

Name:

Michelle Applebaum

X

X

James Declusin

X

X*

Harry Demorest

X*

   

X

Keith LarsonMichael Franson

X

 

X*

  

____________

*Amanda Kulesa

X  

Keith Larson

Committee ChairmanX*

X  

John Paschal

X  

X*

William Yearsley

X  

X  

 

*     Committee Chairperson

Audit Committee.The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight and monitoring of: the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting process, financial internal control systems, accounting, legal, and legalregulatory compliance, and financial reporting; the qualifications, independence, and performance of our independent auditors; our compliance with applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and the maintenance of open and private, if necessary, communication among the independent auditors, management, legal counsel, and the Board.Board of Directors. The Audit Committee met 11eight times in 2015.2020. Each member of the Audit Committee is “independent” as defined by applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC and Nasdaq Stock Market rules. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Demorest andFranson, Larson, and Ms. Applebaum each qualifiesYearsley qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC.

 

3

Compensation Committee.The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight and determination of executive compensation by reviewing and approving salaries and other compensation of the Company’s executive officers, and administering the Company’s equity incentive and compensation plans, including reviewing and approving stock option and other equity incentive and compensation awards to executive officers. In addition, the Compensation Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors the level and form of compensation and benefits for directors, and reviewing, recommending, and taking action upon any other compensation practices or policies of the Company as the Board of Directors may request or the Committee may determine to be appropriate. The Committee has sole authority to retain and terminate a compensation consultant to assist in the evaluation of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee met sixfour times in 2015.2020, in addition to adopting a unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting. Each member of the Compensation Committee is “independent” as defined by applicable Nasdaq Stock Market rules.

 

Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors recommends to the Board of Directors corporate governance principles for the Company, identifies qualified candidates for membership on the Board of Directors, and proposes to the Board of Directors for its approval nominees for election as directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee met four times in 2015.2020. Each member of the Nominating and Governance Committee is “independent” as defined by applicable Nasdaq Stock Market rules.


Communications with Directors

 

Any shareholder who wants to communicate with members of the Board of Directors, individually or as a group, may do so by writing to the intended member or members of the Board of Directors, c/o Chairman of the Board, Northwest Pipe Company, 5721 SE Columbia Way, Suite 200, Vancouver Washington 98661. Communications should be sent by overnight or certified mail, return receipt requested. All communications will be submitted to the Board of Directors in a timely manner.Director Qualifications and Diversity

 

Nominations by Shareholders In identifying qualified candidates for the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider recommendations by shareholders. Shareholder recommendations as to candidates for election to the Board of Directors may be submitted to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Northwest Pipe Company, 5721 SE Columbia Way, Suite 200, Vancouver, Washington 98661. The Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate potential nominees, including candidates recommended by shareholders, by reviewing qualifications, considering references, and reviewing and considering such other information as the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee deem relevant. The Company’s Corporate Governance Principles specify that the criteria used by the Nominating and Governance Committee in the selection, review, and evaluation of possible candidates for vacancies on the Board of Directors should include factors relating to whether the candidate would meet the definition of “independent” as well as skills, occupation, and experience in the context of the needs of the Board.Board of Directors. All candidates for election to the Board of Directors must be individuals of character, integrity, and honesty. The Company does not have a formal policy with respect to the consideration of diversity in identifying director candidates; however, the Nominating and Governance Committee Charter includes diversity as one of several criteria in recommending and reviewing a director nominee candidate. From time to time, the Nominating and Governance Committee has employed a third party to help identify or screen prospective directors, and may continue to do so at their discretion.

Communications with Directors

Any shareholder who wants to communicate with members of the Board of Directors, individually or as a group, may do so by writing to the intended member or members of the Board of Directors, c/o Chairperson of the Board, Northwest Pipe Company, 201 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 100, Vancouver, Washington 98684. Communications should be sent by overnight or certified mail, return receipt requested. All communications will be submitted to the intended member(s) of the Board of Directors in a timely manner.

Nominations by Shareholders. In identifying qualified candidates for the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider recommendations by shareholders. Shareholder recommendations as to candidates for election to the Board of Directors may be submitted to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Northwest Pipe Company, 201 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 100, Vancouver, Washington 98684. The Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate potential nominees, including candidates recommended by shareholders, by reviewing qualifications, considering references, and reviewing and considering such other information as the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee deem relevant.

 

The Company’s Bylaws permit shareholders to make nominations for the election of directors, if such nominations are made pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Company’s Secretary. To be timely, notice must be delivered to, or mailed to and received at, the principal executive offices of the Company not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of the meeting, provided that at least 60 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to shareholders. If less than 60 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to shareholders, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be received by the Company not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the date on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. A shareholder’s notice of nomination must also set forth certain information specified in the Company’s Bylaws concerning each person the shareholder proposes to nominate for election and the nominating shareholder.

 

4


 

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

(Proposal No.1)

 

At the Annual Meeting, twothree directors will be elected, each to serve for a three-year terms.term. Unless otherwise specified on the proxy, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote the shares represented by each properly executed proxy for the election of the nominees named below. The Board of Directors believes that the nominees will stand for election and will serve if elected as directors.a director. However, if any of the personsperson nominated by the Board of Directors failfails to stand for election or is unable to accept election, the proxies will be voted for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend.

 

The Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that the Board of Directors shall be composed of not less than six and not more than nine directors. The size of the Board of Directors is currently fixed at sixseven directors. TheUnder the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, the Company’s directors are divided into three classes.classes, with each class to be as nearly equal in number as possible. The term of office of only one class of directors expires each year, and their successors are generally elected for terms of three years, and until their successors are elected and qualified. There is no cumulative voting for election of directors.

 

Information as to Nominees and Continuing Directors

 

The following table sets forth the names of and certain information about the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as a director and those directors who will continue to serve after the Annual Meeting.

 

Age

Director

Since

Expiration

of Current

Term

 

Expiration of

Term for

Which

Nominated

Age

Director

Since

Expiration

of Current

Term

Expiration of

Term for Which

Nominated

Nominees:

        

James Declusin

73

2010

2016

 

2019

Harry Demorest

74

2013

2016

 

2019

Amanda Kulesa

45

2020

2021

2024

Keith Larson

63

2007

2021

2024

Richard Roman

69

2003

2021

2024

        

Continuing Directors:

        

Michelle Applebaum

59

2014

2017

  

Keith Larson

58

2007

2018

  

Michael Franson

66

2016

2022

 

Scott Montross

51

2013

2017

  

56

2013

2023

 

Richard Roman

64

2003

2018

  

John Paschal

62

2019

2023

 

William Yearsley

66

2020

2022

 

 

Nominees for Director

 

James Declusinhas been a director of the Company since August 2010. Mr. Declusin served as President and CEO of Evraz Inc. NA until February 2010 and as President and CEO of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. from August 2003 until Oregon Steel Mills was acquired by Evraz Group SA in January 2007. He served as a director of Oregon Steel Mills and, subsequently, Evraz Inc. NA from 2000 until 2010. Mr. Declusin spent 16 years with California Steel Industries, most recently serving as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, retiring in October 2000. Prior to that time, he spent 17 years in various management positions in the commercial area of Kaiser Steel Corporation. Currently, he is the Board’s Lead Director, Chairman of our Nominating and Governance Committee, and a member of our Compensation Committee. Mr. Declusin brings to the Board over 40 years of experience in the steel industry, including, most recently, as president and chief executive officer of a large publicly-held steel manufacturing company.


Harry Demoresthas been a director of the Company since February 2013. Mr. Demorest served as CEO of Columbia Forest Products from 1996 until 2007, as President from 1994 until 1996, and as Executive Vice President from 1992 until 1994. Prior to Columbia Forest Products, Mr. Demorest was the Office Managing Partner for Arthur Anderson and Co., an independent public accounting firm, from 1981 to 1991 in Portland, Oregon. Mr. Demorest is a former board member at Columbia Forest Products, serving on its compensation and audit committees, and a former board member and audit committee chairman of Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. Mr. Demorest has also served on the boards of several civic and charitable organizations. Currently, he is the Chairman of our Audit Committee and a member of our Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Demorest brings to the Board his extensive financial and managerial experience.

Continuing Directors

Michelle ApplebaumAmanda Kulesa has been a director of the Company since September 2014.July 2020. Ms. ApplebaumKulesa is a senior partner of NeoPsy Systems, a firm specializing in management and organizational psychology. Ms. Kulesa has over 3019 years of experience working with investors and top-level senior executives in capital markets. She joined Salomon Brothersbuilding great companies. Ms. Kulesa provides investor and management teams with an understanding of how to maximize leadership effectiveness and build value creation through long-term strategic planning. Specifically, Ms. Kulesa specializes in 1981, became ranked number oneapplied research to assist in steel equity analysisexecutive selection, executive development, organizational assessment, and strategic planning. Ms. Kulesa holds a PhD and MA in 1988Industrial Psychology from Bowling Green State University and was promoted to Managing Director in 1994. While at Salomon,obtained her undergraduate degree from the University of Colorado Boulder. Currently, Ms. Applebaum was part of a team that built and ran the firm’s steel investment banking practice, which was a top advisor to the sector for nearly a decade. After leaving the firm in 2003, Ms. Applebaum built one of the first and most successful “independent” equity research advisory boutiques. Ms. Applebaum recently retired, and is currently a trustee at Lake Forest College in Chicago and on the advisory board of a financial analytics company. Currently, sheKulesa is a member of our Audit CommitteeNominating and CompensationGovernance Committee. Ms. ApplebaumKulesa brings to the Board her relevant industry experienceknowledge of organizational development and insight, as well as her extensive financial expertise.strategic human capital management.

 

5

Keith Larson has been a director of the Company since May 2007. Mr. Larson is on the board of directors of Rogers Corporation (NYSE:ROG) which designs, develops, manufactures, and sells high-performance and high-reliability engineered materials and components. Mr. Larson is also on the board of directors of one privately-held company which supplies subsystems to semiconductor equipment manufacturers, and is an advisor to other privately-held companies. Mr. Larson was a Vice President of Intel Corporation and Senior Managing Director of Intel Capital, Intel Corporation’s strategic investment group.group, until his retirement in April 2019, where he was a voting member of the investment committee and managed the Financial Investments Portfolio, along with other duties. Mr. Larson was appointed Vice President in 2006 and has served as a Managing Director of Intel Capital sincefrom 2004 to 2018, managing a team of investment professionals focused on identifying, making, and managing strategic investments in the manufacturing, wearables,memory and programmable solutions, and Intel Labs sectors, as well as the Japan region.Sports and Bioinformatics vertical sectors. Mr. Larson has previously managed Latin America, Taiwan, Korea, and KoreaJapan regions for Intel Capital, and for approximately three months in 2004, Mr. Larson managed the Western Europe and Israel investment team of Intel Capital. From 1999 to 2003, Mr. Larson was a Sector Director managing teams of investment professionals investing in communications, networking, and data storage sectors. Mr. Larson also currently servesformerly served on the board of regents of a university, and formerly served on onea state government council, which oversaw approximately $80 billion in investments of various Oregon State agencies and funds such asincluding the Oregon Public Employees Retirement Fund. Mr. Larson attended UCLA and holds a BS in Business Administration, Accounting (Cum Laude) from the University of Southern California. Currently, heMr. Larson is the ChairmanChairperson of our CompensationAudit Committee and a member of our AuditCompensation Committee. Mr. Larson brings to the Board his experience as a senior executive in corporate development in a large multinational public company as well as his experience in corporate governance.

 


Scott MontrossRichard Roman has been a director of the Company since January 2013. Mr. Montross has served as our President2003 and CEO since January 2013, and as our Chief Operating Officer from May 2011 until December 2012. Previously he served as Executive Vice President, Flat Products Group of Evraz, Inc. NA from March 2010 through April 2011. Mr. Montross served as Vice President, General Manager, Evraz Oregon Steel from February 2007 through February 2010. Prior to his General Manager role, Mr. Montross served as Vice President of Sales at Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. from June 2003 through February 2007. From 2002 to 2003, Mr. Montross was a Vice President of Sales for National Steel Corporation. Mr. Montross brings to the Board his extensive commercial and operational experience in the steel industry.

Richard Romanhas been a director of the Company since 2003. Effective January 1, 2013, Mr. Roman became the ChairmanChairperson of the Board of Directors.Directors since January 2013. Mr. Roman has also served as our CEO from March 2010 until December 2012, and as our President from October 2010 until December 2012. Previously, Mr. Roman was the President of Columbia Ventures Corporation, a private investment company which historically has focused principally on the international metals and telecommunications industries. Prior to joining Columbia Ventures Corporation in 1992, Mr. Roman was a partner at Coopers & Lybrand, an independent public accounting firm. Mr. Roman also serves on the Boardreceived a BA from Grinnell College and a MBA from University of Directors of one privately held manufacturing company.Chicago. Mr. Roman brings to the CompanyBoard his knowledge and experience as a partner at a large national independent public accounting firm as well as his more recent management experience as an executive officer of a private investment company.

 

Continuing Directors

Michael Franson has been a director of the Company since August 2016. Mr. Franson previously served on the Board of Directors from 2001 until 2005 and again from 2007 until 2014. In July 2016, Mr. Franson retired from KPMG Corporate Finance LLC as Managing Director and Global Head of Technology M&A after serving in that role from 2014 to 2016. From 2005 to 2014, Mr. Franson was a co-founder and President of St. Charles Capital LLC, an investment banking firm focused on mergers and acquisitions, raising private capital and providing financial advisory services for middle-market companies across the United States. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Franson was a Managing Director at The Wallach Company, which was subsequently sold to KeyCorp, the parent of KeyBanc Capital Markets. Mr. Franson holds a BS in Marketing from California State University at Chico and a MBA in Finance from the University of Oregon, Charles H. Lundquist College of Business. Currently, Mr. Franson is the Chairperson of our Compensation Committee and a member of our Audit Committee. Mr. Franson brings to the Board his background and expertise in investment banking, including substantial experience in financial analysis and financial advisory services, merger and acquisition transactions, and a wide variety of capital raising and financing transactions.

Scott Montross has been a director of the Company since January 2013. Mr. Montross has served as our President and CEO since January 2013 and served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from May 2011 until December 2012. Mr. Montross has served in senior vice president level positions since 2003 with commercial, operational, and planning responsibilities and has spent a total of 24 years in the steel industry prior to joining the Company. Mr. Montross previously served as the Executive Vice President, Flat Products Group for EVRAZ North America’s Oregon Steel Division from 2010 to 2011, as the Vice President and General Manager of EVRAZ North America from 2007 to 2010, as the Vice President of Marketing and Sales for Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. from 2003 to 2007, and as the Vice President of Marketing and Sales for National Steel Corporation from 2002 to 2003. Mr. Montross has a BA from Colgate University. Mr. Montross brings to the Board his in-depth knowledge of the Company and its industry through his years of service as CEO, as well as his extensive commercial and operational experience in the steel industry.

6

John Paschal has been a director of the Company since August 2019. Mr. Paschal was the President of the Temtco Steel Division of Kloeckner Metals Corporation until his retirement in December 2020. Mr. Paschal and his late uncle, Bill Taylor of Taylor Machine Works, co-founded Temtco Steel in 1979 with an emphasis on high-strength steel and value added services. Temtco Steel was sold to Kloeckner Metals in 2008. Mr. Paschal graduated from Mississippi State University with a BS in Business Administration. Currently, Mr. Paschal is a member of our Compensation Committee and a member of our Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Paschal brings to the Board his extensive experience in the steel industry as well as his executive leadership and business management skills.

William Yearsley has been a director of the Company since March 2020. Mr. Yearsley is an investor and lead outside director at Tri-Arc, LLC and is the CEO of Terra CO2 Technologies Ltd., which develops new technologies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the production of cement. Mr. Yearsley has also been a limited partner of Lariat Partners Fund One since 2013 and served as its operating partner from 2013 to 2019. Mr. Yearsley was a director and interim CEO of Sioux Creek Silica LLC from November 2014 until December 2020. From 2011 to 2012, Mr. Yearsley was the CEO of Real Goods Solar, Inc., a publicly traded engineering, procurement, and construction solar company. From 2007 to 2011, Mr. Yearsley was an endowed professor at the University of Colorado Boulder Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, and was honored as the top teaching faculty member in 2011. In 1996, Mr. Yearsley co-founded American Civil Constructors and led the company as chairman and CEO until 2007. From 1984 to 1997, Mr. Yearsley was employed by Redland PLC, a FTSE 100 firm traded on the London Stock Exchange, and later in his tenure served as chairman and CEO of the construction materials and non-metallic mining groups. Mr. Yearsley has also served on several boards of privately-owned construction related businesses. Mr. Yearsley holds a BS in Engineering from Southern Illinois University and a MS in Industrial Science and a PhD in Construction Engineering from Colorado State University. Currently, Mr. Yearsley is a member of our Audit Committee and a member of our Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Yearsley brings to the Board his extensive experience with merger and acquisition transactions, capital raising, management of public and private companies, as well as his substantial knowledge of the construction industry.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR”FOR THE ELECTION OF ITS NOMINEESNOMINEE FOR DIRECTOR. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE VOTED “FOR”FOR THE ELECTION OF THE BOARD’S NOMINEESBOARDS NOMINEE UNLESS A VOTE WITHHOLDING AUTHORITY IS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED.

 

7


 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

This compensation discussion and analysis provides information about our compensation program for our 2015 CEO, our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), our former CFO, and each of the three other most highly compensated executive officers (“Named Executive Officers:Officers”):

Scott Montross, President and Chief Executive Officer;

Aaron Wilkins, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Corporate Secretary (1);

William Smith, Executive Vice President of Water Transmission Engineered Systems;

Miles Brittain, Senior Vice President of Operations (2);

Eric Stokes, Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Water Transmission (3); and

Robin Gantt, Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (1);

 

(1)

Scott Montross, President and Chief Executive Officer;On April 1, 2020, Mr. Wilkins was appointed CFO upon Ms. Gantt’s retirement as CFO.

 

(2)

Robin Gantt,In February 2020, Mr. Brittain was promoted to Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;of Operations.

 

(3)

Martin Dana, ExecutiveIn February 2020, Mr. Stokes was promoted to Senior Vice President Sales;

William Smith, Executive Vice President Operations;of Sales and

Vicki Taylor, Vice President Human Resources. Marketing, Water Transmission.

 

Further information about each of our executive officers is available in Part III Item 1010. “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance” of our 20152020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.to Shareholders.

 

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives.The Board of Directors and executive management at the Company believe that the performance and contribution of our executive officers are critical to our overall success. To attract, retain, and motivate the executives to accomplish our business strategy, the Compensation Committee establishes executive compensation policies and oversees executive compensation practices at the Company.

 

The Compensation Committee believes that the most effective executive compensation program is one that is designed to reward the achievement of our specific annual and long-term goals, and which aligns executives’ interests with those of the shareholders by rewarding performance that exceeds established goals, with the ultimate objective of improving shareholder value.

 

The Compensation Committee also evaluates compensation programs to ensure that we maintain our ability to attract, retain, and motivate superior employees in key positions and that compensation provided to key employees remains competitive when compared with other employment opportunities. The Compensation Committee believes our executive compensation packages should include both cash and share-based compensation that reward performance as measured against established goals and market performance.


goals.

 

In 2011, the Compensation Committee engaged Mercer LLC (“Mercer”) to conduct an overall review of our executive compensation program, and to advise the Compensation Committee on the levels of base salary as well as on the design of the Company’s performance-based cash incentive program and long-term equity incentive program. To that end, Mercer developed a competitive peer group and performed benchmarking analysis of the levels and mix of compensation. The Compensation Committee used the results from this peer group and benchmarking analysis as reference data in making judgments regarding executive compensation without the implementation of a formal policy. The following peer companies were included in the analysis:

Aegion Corp.

Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.

Circor Intl Inc.

Flow Intl Corp.

Foster (LB) Co.

Lindsay Corp.

Lufkin Industries Inc.

MFRI Inc.

Mueller Water Products Inc.

Synalloy Corp.

Valmont Industries, Inc.

Process for Setting Executive Compensation. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the salaries and other discretionary compensation of the Company’s executive officers, and administers the Company’s equity incentive and compensation plans, including reviewing and approving equity incentive and discretionary compensation awards to executives. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and approves compensation levels and pay mix for our executives.

 

The Compensation Committee exercises business judgment in determining the appropriate level and mix of executive compensation; cash compensation is used to provide a base salary, and to incentivize and reward our executives based on their contributions to the Company, and equity-based compensation is used to tie the interests of the executives to the interests of our shareholders. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation, which enables the Compensation Committee the flexibility to adjust allocations dynamically as business conditions warrant.

The Compensation Committee uses qualitative individual performance objectives as a factor in making its decisions. The Compensation Committee and the CEO annually review the performance of each executive officer (other than the CEO whose performance is reviewed by the Compensation Committee after an evaluation from the Chairman). Based on these reviews, the Compensation Committee makes compensation decisions, including salary adjustments and annual bonus awards, for the executive officers.

The Compensation Committee evaluates and considers the Company's annual performance within the context of its long-term strategic plan, identifying areas in which expectations were exceeded, achieved or fell below stated goals. The structure of all incentive compensation plans is reviewed periodically to assure their linkage to the current objectives, strategies and performance goals.

The Compensation Committee exercises business judgment in determining the appropriate level and mix of executive compensation; cash compensation is used to provide a base salary, and to incentivize and reward our executives based on their contributions to the Company, and equity-based compensation is used to tie the interests of the executives to the interests of our shareholders. There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash and noncash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation, which enables the Compensation Committee the flexibility to adjust allocations dynamically as business conditions warrant.

 

8


The Compensation Committee uses qualitative individual performance objectives as a factor in making its decisions. The Compensation Committee and the CEO annually review the performance of each executive officer (other than the CEO whose performance is reviewed by the Compensation Committee after an evaluation from the Chairperson). Based on these reviews, the Compensation Committee makes compensation decisions, including salary adjustments and annual discretionary incentive compensation awards, for the executive officers.

The Compensation Committee evaluates and considers the Company’s annual performance within the context of its long-term strategic plan, identifying areas in which expectations were exceeded, achieved, or fell below stated goals. The structure of all incentive compensation plans is reviewed periodically to assure their linkage to the current objectives, strategies, and performance goals.

The Compensation Committee evaluates and considers a variety of growth and profitability measures relative to historical performance and internal plans for awarding performance-based cash incentive compensation.

The Compensation Committee evaluates and considers performance criteria for awarding equity incentive awards.

 

 

The Compensation Committee evaluates and considers a variety of growth and profitability measures relative to historical performance and internal plans for awarding performance-based cash incentive compensation.

The Compensation Committee evaluates and considers Total Shareholder Return, defined as the total increase in share price plus dividends, relative to peer performance and other performance criteria for awarding long-term equity incentive awards. For the first time since 2010, due to continuing challenging economic conditions, no grants were awarded under our long-term equity incentive program in 2015.

The Compensation Committee generally does not utilize specific benchmark levels. Rather, the Compensation Committee considers broad, market basedmarket-based survey data of comparable companies, such as that provided by Mercer LLC, Equilar, CompAnalyst, Willis Towers Watson, andWorldatWork.org, when assessing the competitiveness of compensation levels and pay mix for the CEO, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)CFO, and other executives.

From time to time, the Compensation Committee has retained Mercer to advise the Committee on executive or director compensation matters, to assess total compensation program levels and program elements for executive officers or directors, and to evaluate marketplace trends in executive or director compensation. In so doing, the Compensation Committee has considered all relevant factors that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest with Mercer, and has determined that none exist. In 2015, the Compensation Committee retained Mercer to perform a limited review of compensation programs for various employee groups. No changes were made during the year to executive or director compensation as a result of their review.

 

From time to time, the Compensation Committee has retained independent consultants to advise the Committee on executive or director compensation matters, to assess total compensation program levels and program elements for executive officers or directors, and to evaluate marketplace trends in executive or director compensation. The Compensation Committee retained an independent consultant, Willis Towers Watson, in 2020 to perform a market review of executive compensation and incentive plans. In so doing, the Compensation Committee considered all relevant factors that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest with Willis Towers Watson, and determined that none existed.

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation.Each year the Compensation Committee submits to shareholders an advisory resolution on executive compensation, and carefully considers the voting results of this proposal, though the final vote is advisory in nature and therefore not binding on the Company. Our shareholders expressed strong support for our executive compensation program in the advisory vote at our 20152020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Based upon these results, the Compensation Committee has determined to follow the shareholders’ recommendation by continuing our present compensation policies and practices.

 

Elements of Compensation.For the year ended December 31, 2015,2020, the principal targeted components of compensation for executive officers were:

 

base salary;

performance-based cash incentive compensation;

long-term equity incentive awards (restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and PSAs);

retirement benefits; and

perquisites and other personal benefits.

base salary;

performance-based cash incentive compensation;

discretionary incentive compensation;

equity incentive awards (performance share awards (“PSAs”) and restricted stock units (“RSUs”));

retirement benefits; and

perquisites and other personal benefits.

 

9


 

The target weighting of each of the components of compensation reflected in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table on page 14 for the CEO and other Named Executive Officers was as follows for the year ended December 31, 2015:2020:

 

 

chart7.jpg
chart8.jpg

 

10


 

Realized Pay vs. Reported Pay.Pay. In the following table, Reported Pay is compensation reflected in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table on page 17.14. Realized Pay is compensation actually received byfor each of the Named Executive Officer during the year, includingOfficers includes base salary, performance-based andcash incentive compensation earned for the respective year’s performance, discretionary cash incentive compensation paid during the respective year, market values at vesting of previously granted RSUs and PSAs, and All Other Compensation amounts received during the year. Realized Pay was greaterless than Reported Pay in 20152020 for all Named Executive Officers, otherexcept for Ms. Gantt, as the value of the equity incentive awards received was less than the value of equity incentive awards granted. Since Ms. Taylor due to the fact that no Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards were issuedGantt retired in 2015, yet certain Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards issuedMarch 2020, she was not granted equity incentive awards, which is reflected in prior years vested in 2015.her 2020 Reported Pay.

 

 

2015

  

2014

  

2013

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 
 

Realized Pay

  

Reported Pay

  

Realized Pay

  

Reported Pay

  

Realized Pay

  

Reported Pay

  

Realized Pay

  

Reported Pay

  

Realized Pay

  

Reported Pay

  

Realized Pay

  

Reported Pay

 

Scott Montross

 925,636  $630,134  $1,188,227  $1,394,848  $935,163  $1,599,883  $1,691,004  $1,962,273  $1,242,058  $2,037,066  $1,591,219  $891,994 
                        

Aaron Wilkins

  580,580   778,930   466,194   546,203   377,865   268,920 

William Smith

  742,473   823,629   622,787   884,610   806,817   379,086 

Miles Brittain

  562,643   734,673   555,702   664,714   524,897   346,454 

Eric Stokes

  502,529   662,605   469,811   585,228   313,119   313,119 

Robin Gantt

  494,318   355,306   607,637   596,803   492,106   650,917   580,081   378,206   633,530   898,722   816,698   430,197 
                        

Martin Dana

  438,744   364,817   488,258   638,411   399,199   446,888 
                        

William Smith

  452,073   377,705   651,800   747,214   469,649   522,250 
                        

Vicki Taylor

  206,012   206,012   22,157   22,157   -   - 

 

Base Salary.We provide executive officers and other employees with a base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year. Base salaries are determined for each executive based on his or hertheir experience, position, and responsibilities, and take in tointo consideration market data and conditions. In addition, we consider the individual performance of each executive, and conduct internal reviews of each executive’s compensation, to ensure equity among executive officers. Salary levels are typically reviewed annually as part of our performance review process as well as upon a promotion or other change in job responsibility. Merit based increases to salaries are based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the individual executive’s performance in conjunction with recommendations provided by the CEO.

 

Base salary is reflected in the ‘Salary’ column in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table on page 17.14.

 

Performance-Based Cash Incentive Compensation.We provide, executive officers and other employees withfrom time to time, incentive compensation to retain, incentivize, and reward thememployees for high performance and achievement of corporate goals. The incentive compensation program provides for an award of cash incentive compensation to executive officers and others as a reward for our growth and profitability, and places a significant percentage of each executive officer’s compensation at risk. Awards are based on our achievement of certain financial performance measures each year.measures.

 

The performance measure for 2015In 2020, each Named Executive Officer, except for the Named Executive Officersformer CFO, was awarded short term incentive plans providing for cash payments for the achievement of certain levels of adjusted income before income taxes for the 2020 fiscal year. Adjusted Incomeincome before Income Taxes, for which the Compensation Committee established a target level of $30.0 million. Adjusted Income before Income Taxesincome taxes is calculated by adjusting our income before income taxes as reported in our audited financial statements for certain events that occur during the year, such as the acquisitionsacquisition of businesses, the sales of significant capital assets, or other extraordinary or unusual developments. For 2015, Adjusted Income2020, adjusted income before Income Taxesincome taxes excludes net insurance recoveries and gains resulting from the impairmentApril 2019 accidental fire at our Saginaw, Texas facility (“Saginaw Fire”), other unusual net gains and incremental production costs, and intangible amortization expense as a result of our Water Transmission goodwill.the Geneva Pipe and Precast Company (“Geneva”) acquisition.


 

The Compensation Committee also establishedfollowing scale shows the payout as a payout range for the awards for each executive officer based on the levelpercentage of achievement of the performance measure. For Mr. Montross, the target payout for 2015 was seventy percent of 2015 annual base salary upon achievement of one hundred percent of the performance target, with the payout range extending from $0 at or below fifty percent of target performance to one hundred and forty percent of 2015 base salary at or above one hundred and thirty percent of target performance. For the other Named Executive Officers, the target payout for 2015 was fifty percent (thirty percent in the case of Ms. Taylor) of 2015 annual base salary upon achievement of one hundred percent of performance target, with the payout range extending from $0 at or below fifty percent of target performance to one hundred percent (sixty percent in the case of Ms. Taylor) of 2015 annual base salary at or above one hundred and thirty percent of target performance.that may be awarded. Payouts for performance withinbetween the range will berankings are interpolated on a straight line basis. Even if the performance measures are met, the Compensation Committee retains the right to adjust the actual amounts of the award to each individual at its discretion. Such adjustments may be based on individual performance, as well as external factors affecting us or the occurrence of unusual or infrequent events; in 2013, Mr. Montross’s award was reduced by five percent for adjustments based on individual performance. The following table reflects, for each of the Named Executive Officers, the applicable performance target, actual performance and amount of award: straight-line basis:

 

Name

 

2015

Performance

Target

(million $)

  

2015

Actual

Performance

(million $)

  

2015

Target

Award

($)

  

2015

Actual

Award

($)

 
                 

Scott Montross

 $30.0  $(36.1) $371,000  $- 

Robin Gantt

  30.0   (36.1)  151,867   - 

Martin Dana

  30.0   (36.1)  154,020   - 

William Smith

  30.0   (36.1)  154,020   - 

Vicki Taylor

  30.0   (36.1)  61,146   - 

Adjusted Income before Income Taxes

Performance in 2020

 

Payout as a Percentage of Base

Salary for Mr. Montross

 

Payout as a Percentage of Base

Salary for the other Named

Executive Officers

> $39,439,500

  

140%

  

100%

 

$26,293,000

  

70%

  

50%

 

$13,146,500

  

35%

  

25%

 

< $13,146,500

  

0%

  

0%

 

Cash payments under this short term incentive plan were made in March 2021, and were determined by multiplying base salary times the payout percentage of 75.5% for Mr. Montross and 53.9% for Messrs. Wilkins, Smith, Brittain, and Stokes.

 

Performance-based cash incentive compensation if awarded, is reflected in the ‘Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation’ column in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table on page 17.14.

 

11

Discretionary Incentive Compensation.We provide, from time to time, additional discretionary incentive compensation in recognition of an executive officer'sofficer’s or other employee'semployee’s success in attaining results that delivered value to the Company, but were not captured in the performance-based cash incentive compensation, or for other reasons as determined appropriate by the Compensation Committee.

In 2020, discretionary cash incentive compensation was awarded to each Named Executive Officer, except for the former CFO, for value capture and creation related to the acquisition of Geneva.

 

Discretionary incentive compensation if awarded, is reflected in the ‘Bonus’ column in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table on page 17. There has been no discretionary incentive compensation awarded in 2015, 2014 or 2013.14.

 

Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards. We provide long-term equity incentive awards to executive officers and certain designated key employees. The long-term equity incentive awards are designed to ensure that our executive officers and key employees have a continuing stake in our long-term success. In addition, the awards emphasize pay-for-performance. Terms and conditions of the awards are determined on an annual basis by the Compensation Committee. Due to continuing challenging economic conditions, no Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards were granted in 2015.


 

When granted, RSUs are service-based and entitle the holder to receive Common Stock at the end of the vesting period (generally over approximatelyperiods up to three years), subject to continued employment. RSUs are designed to attract and retain executive officers and others by providing them with the benefits associated with the increase in the value of the Common Stock during the vesting period, while incentivizing them to remain with us long-term.

 

When granted, PSAs are service-based awards with a market-basedperformance-based vesting condition. PSAs serve several purposes. They have value to the holder only if the goals are achieved during their performance measurement period, and they serve as a retention tool because the performance measurement periods generally extend over approximately three years.one year. Additionally, the holders benefit further if they are successful in increasing the value of our Common Stock. PriorWhen PSAs wereare granted, with a market-basedthey typically include vesting conditionconditions that entitlesentitle the holder to receive between zero and two hundred200 percent of the target award. Payouts for performance between the rankings will be interpolated on a straight-line basis.

In 2020, each Named Executive Officer, except for the former CFO, received an award of PSAs and RSUs valued at an amount equal to a specific percentage of their respective annual base salary, with 75 percent of each award represented by PSAs and 25 percent of each award represented by RSUs.

The PSAs awarded will vest based on our Total Shareholder Return compared to our PSA peer group.the Company’s Earnings before Interest Expense, Income Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization Margin before extraordinary or unusual items (“EBITDA Margin Performance”) over the measurement period. The following scale shows the adjustment to the number of PSAs that may be awarded following the measurement period:

 

Total Shareholder Return

vs. Peer Group

Payout as a Percentage of Target Award

85th percentile or higher

200%

50th percentile

100%

25th percentile

25%

Less than 25th percentile

0%

EBITDA Margin Performance

 

Payout as a Percentage of Target Award

>14.2%

  

200%

 

10.1%

  

100%

 

5.8%

  

50%

 

<5.8%

  

0%

 

 

PayoutsOne-third of the PSAs vested on March 31, 2021 based on EBITDA Margin Performance for performance between the rankings2020 fiscal year, which excluded net insurance recoveries and gains resulting from the Saginaw Fire, other unusual net gains and incremental production costs, and acquisition-related transaction costs for Geneva; the actual number of shares of Common Stock that were issued was determined by multiplying the PSAs by a payout percentage of 200%. One-third of the PSAs will be interpolatedvest on a straight line basis.March 31, 2022 based on EBITDA Margin Performance for the 2020-2021 fiscal years and one-third of the PSAs will vest on March 31, 2023 based on EBITDA Margin Performance for the 2020-2022 fiscal years.

 

Long-term equityIn the event a “change in control” of the Company (as defined in the Performance Share Unit Agreement) occurs at any time prior to March 31, 2023, the PSAs will be immediately vested and the amount awarded will be based on the results obtained through the change in control date.

The RSUs awarded vest in three equal installments on January 15, 2021, January 17, 2022, and January 16, 2023, based upon continued service with the Company on that date. In the event a “change in control” of the Company (as defined in the RSU agreement) occurs at any time prior to January 16, 2023, a pro-rata number of RSUs will be calculated based on time elapsed as of the date of the change in control, and those RSUs will be immediately vested.

12

Equity incentive awards are reflected in the ‘Stock Awards’ column in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table on page 17.14. These amounts represent the target value of the award issued, but not what was actually received by the Named Executive Officer. Over the 2012 – 2014 performance period corresponding with our 2012 performance grants, when the award vested in 2015 our Total Shareholder Return was 26%, resulting in a ranking in the 36% percentile, and a payout of 59% of the target award.

 

Retirement Benefits. In order to provide competitive total compensation, we offer our executive officers and certain designated key employees a nonqualified retirement savings plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”), which provides executive officers and others with the opportunity to defer salary and bonus compensation for a period of years or until termination of employment. Executive officers who defer salary or bonus under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited with market-based returns. We may make a discretionary matching contribution based on deferrals made by each participant. In addition, we will make a contribution based on a target benefit projected for each participant. The target benefit projected is 1% of base salary in the year before attaining normal retirement age per year of employment (up to 35 years) with us. For 2015, Company contributions to the Deferred Compensation Plan accounted for between zero and eleven percent of the total compensation for each of the Named Executive Officers.


We also offer a qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan. The ability of executive officers to participate fully in this plan is limited under IRS and ERISA requirements. The 401(k) plan encourages employees to save for retirement by investing on a regular basis through payroll deductions. The retirement benefits include Company contributions to a qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan.

 

Retirement benefits are reflected in the ‘All Other Compensation’ column in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table on page 17.14.

 

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. We provide executive officers with limited perquisites and other personal benefits that we and the Compensation Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program to better enable us to attract, retain, and motivate employees for key positions. We are selective in our use of perquisites, utilizing perquisites that are commonly provided, the value of which is generally modest. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to executive officers. The primary perquisites are car allowances and life insurance premiums.premiums, auto allowance, and phone allowance.

 

Perquisites and other personal benefits are reflected in the ‘All Other Compensation’ column in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table on page 17.14.

 

Executive Compensation and Risk. Although a substantial portion of the compensation paid to our executive officers is performance-based, weWe believe our executive compensation programs do not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking by our executive officers because theseour programs are designed to encourage our executive officers to remain focused on both the short-term and long-term operational and financial goals of the Company. We achieve this balance through a combination of elements in our overall compensation plans, including: elements that reward different aspects of short-term and long-term performance; incentive compensation that rewards performance on a variety of different measures; awards that are paid based on results averaged out over several years; and awards paid in cash and awards paid in shares of the Company’s stock, to encourage better alignment with the interests of shareholders. Additionally, annual compensation decisions for executive officers are influenced by the review of the performance of each executive officer by the Compensation Committee, including an evaluation of the officers’ commitment to promoting effective internal controls and legal and regulatory compliance. We believe this helps to ensure “the tone at the top” deters unnecessary risk-taking.

 

Clawback Provisions. Our performance-based cashequity incentive compensation program containsawards contain a provision that allows the Company to recapture amounts paid to the Named Executive Officers under certain circumstances. If the Company’s financial statements are the subject of a restatement due to misconduct, to the extent permitted by governing law, in all appropriate cases, the Company will seek reimbursement of excess incentive cashshare compensation paidgranted under the programagreements for the relevant years. For purposes of this provision, excess incentive cashshare compensation means the positive difference, if any, between (i) the award paid to the Named Executive Officer and (ii) the award that would have been madepaid to the Named Executive Officer not including the effect of any discretionary reductions made by the Committee, had the target award been calculated based on the Company’s financial statements as restated.

 


Stock Ownership and Anti-Hedging/Pledging Policy. The Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors has adopted a stock ownership policy because it believes it is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to align the financial interests of our executive officers and directors with those of the Company’s shareholders. Under the policy, the directors are expected to accumulate and own shares having a market value equal to three times their annual cash retainer; the CEO is expected to accumulate and own shares having a market value equal to three times his base salary; and each of the other Named Executive Officers is expected to accumulate and own shares having a market value equal to either one or two times his or hertheir base salary, depending on his or hertheir position with the Company. Each executive officer or director has five years to accumulate the expected ownership level beginning from the later of September 2011 or their date of hire or promotion. Until such ownership is achieved, each executive officer or director is required to retain 100% of net after-tax shares issued upon vesting of equity incentive awards. In addition, executive officers and directors are expressly prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions related to the Company’s stock, including trading in publicly-traded options, puts, calls, or other derivative instruments related to the Company’s stock, and from pledging the Company’s stock as collateral for a loan.

 

13

Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation

 

The following table reflects compensation earned by our CEO, our CFO, and each of the three other most highly compensated executive officers,Named Executive Officers for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142020, 2019, and 2013 (the “Named Executive Officers”).2018.

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

Name and Principal Position Year  Salary(1)  Bonus 

Stock

Awards(2)

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

 

All Other

Compensation

   Total ($)
                      

Scott Montross

 

2015

 $530,000  -  -  - $100,134 (3) $630,134

Director, Chief Executive

 

2014

  500,000  - $869,988  -  24,860 (3)  1,394,848

Officer and President

 

2013

  500,000  -  933,963 $112,970  52,950 (3)  1,599,883
                      

Robin Gantt

 

2015

  303,735  -  -  -  51,571 (4)  355,306

Senior Vice President, Chief

 

2014

  288,685  -  288,100  -  20,018 (4)  596,803

Financial Officer

 

2013

  274,938  -  294,536  46,706  34,737 (4)  650,917
                      

Martin Dana

 

2015

  308,040  -  -  -  56,777 (5)  364,817

Executive Vice President

 

2014

  308,040  -  303,722  -  26,649 (5)  638,411
  

2013

  258,710  -  143,265  20,876  24,037 (5)  446,888
                      

William Smith

 

2015

  308,040  -  -  -  69,666 (6)  377,706

Executive Vice President

 

2014

  308,040  -  303,722  -  135,452 (6)  747,214
  

2013

  261,348  -  155,653  75,077  30,172 (6)  522,250
                      

Vicki Taylor(7)

 

2015

  203,821  -  -  -  2,191 (8)  206,012

Vice President

 

2014

  22,056  -  -  -  101 (8)  22,157
  

2013

  -  -  -  -  - (8)  -

___


Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

  

Bonus

  

Stock Awards (1)

  

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

  

All Other Compensation

  

Total ($)

 
                          

Scott Montross

2020

 $577,368  $60,000  $876,492  $435,658  $12,755 (2) $1,962,273 

Director, Chief Executive

2019

  549,875   106,000   795,008   577,369   8,814 (2)  2,037,066 

   Officer, and President

2018

  530,001   -   353,329   -   8,664 (2)  891,994 
                          

Aaron Wilkins (3)

2020

  305,000   38,000   259,251   164,386   12,293 (4)  778,930 

Senior Vice President,

2019

  238,333   40,000   80,009   178,750   9,111 (4)  546,203 

Chief Financial Officer

2018

  200,000   -   60,010   -   8,910 (4)  268,920 
                          

William Smith

2020

  326,820   25,000   280,491   176,146   15,172 (2)  823,629 

Executive Vice President

2019

  314,971   62,000   261,823   236,228   9,588 (2)  884,610 
 

2018

  308,041   -   61,607   -   9,438 (2)  379,086 
                          

Miles Brittain

2020

  297,709   8,000   254,987   160,456   13,521 (4)  734,673 

Senior Vice President

2019

  280,675   55,000   109,012   210,506   9,521 (4)  664,714 
 

2018

  260,000   -   77,244   -   9,210 (4)  346,454 
                          

Eric Stokes (5)

2020

  266,250   7,000   231,615   143,501   14,239 (6)  662,605 

Senior Vice President

2019

  242,050   24,000   115,417   181,538   22,223 (6)  585,228 
 

2018

  224,703   66,381   -   -   22,035 (6)  313,119 
                          

Robin Gantt (3)

2020

  365,887   -   -   -   12,319 (4)  378,206 

Former Chief Financial

2019

  321,360   62,000   265,192   241,020   9,150 (4)  898,722 
       Officer

2018

  312,001   -   109,196   -   9,000 (4)  430,197 

 

(1)

Includes amounts earned in each of the respective years, even if deferred.

(2)(1)

The amounts included in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs and PSAs granted during the years reported in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value for the stock awards are in Note 1113 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II – Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of our 2020 Annual Report to Shareholders. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executive Officers.

(2)

Includes amounts paid by us for contributions to the qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan and life insurance premiums.

(3)

On April 1, 2020, Mr. Wilkins was appointed CFO upon Ms. Gantt’s retirement as CFO. Pursuant to a Separation Agreement, Ms. Gantt continued to be employed by the Company as a Consultant from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021.

(4)

Includes amounts paid by us for contributions to the qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan, life insurance premiums, and a monthly phone allowance.

(5)

Mr. Stokes was promoted to Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing, Water Transmission in February 2020 and named an executive officer in June 2020.

(6)

Includes amounts paid by us for contributions to the qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan, life insurance premiums, and a monthly auto allowance until his promotion in February 2020.

14

2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth, for each of the Named Executive Officers, the performance-based incentive awards granted for the year ended December 31, 2020. No performance-based awards were granted to Ms. Gantt, former CFO.

    

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards (1)

  

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity

Incentive Plan Awards

  

All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of

  

 

Grant Date Fair Value of
 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  

Threshold

(#)

  

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

  

Stock or Units

(#)

  

Stock Awards

(4)

 

Scott Montross

 

Non-Equity Award

 $-  $404,158  $808,316                     
  

3/26/2020

 (2)              -   24,667   49,334      $657,376 
  

3/26/2020

 (3)                         8,222   219,116 
                                   

Aaron Wilkins

 

Non-Equity Award

  -   152,500   305,000                     
  

3/26/2020

 (2)             -   7,296   14,592       194,438 
  

3/26/2020

 (3)                          2,432   64,813 
                                   

William Smith

 

Non-Equity Award

  -   163,410   326,820                     
  

3/26/2020

 (2)             -   7,894   15,788       210,375 
  

3/26/2020

 (3)                         2,631   70,116 
                                   

Miles Brittain

 

Non-Equity Award

  -   148,855   297,710                     
  

3/26/2020

 (2)             -   7,176   14,352       191,240 
  

3/26/2020

 (3)                         2,392   63,747 
                                   

Eric Stokes

 

Non-Equity Award

  -   133,125   266,250                     
  

3/26/2020

 (2)             -   6,518   13,036       173,705 
  

3/26/2020

 (3)                         2,173   57,910 

(1)

These columns show the possible payouts for each Named Executive Officer under the short term incentive plans based on the goals set in March 2020. Additional information is included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and detail regarding actual awards under the short term incentive plan is reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)

Awards represent the PSAs granted under the equity incentive plan. The methodology applied in determining these awards and how they are earned is discussed under “Equity Incentive Awards” above.

(3)

Awards represent the RSUs granted under the equity incentive plan. The methodology applied in determining these awards and how they are earned is discussed under “Equity Incentive Awards” above.

(4)

The amount included in this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value for the stock awards are in Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II – Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of our 20152020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the named executives.

(3)

Amount includes $71,897 and $28,055 in 2015 and 2013, respectively, contributed by us to Mr. Montross’s nonqualified retirement savings plan, and amounts paid by us for contributions to Mr. Montross’s qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan, life insurance premiums and annual automobile allowance.

(4)

Amount includes $31,427 and $12,692 in 2015 and 2013, respectively, contributed by us to Ms. Gantt’s nonqualified retirement savings plan, and amounts paid by us for contributions to Ms. Gantt’s qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan, life insurance premiums, annual automobile allowance, and a monthly phone allowance.

(5)

Amount includes $30,741 in 2015 contributed by us to Mr. Dana’s nonqualified retirement savings plan, and amounts paid by us for contributions to Mr. Dana’s qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan, life insurance premiums, annual automobile allowance and a monthly phone allowance.

(6)

Amount includes $31,145 in 2015 contributed by us to Mr. Smith’s nonqualified retirement savings plan, $12,302 and $110,088 in 2015 and 2014, respectively, paid by us for relocation expenses, and amounts paid by us for contributions to Mr. Smith’s qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan, annual automobile allowance and life insurance premiums.

(7)

Ms. Taylor was hired as Vice President of Human Resources in November 2014.

(8)

Amount includes payments by us for contributions to Ms. Taylor’s qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan, life insurance premiums, and a monthly phone allowance.

2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

    

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards(1)

  

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity

Incentive Plan Awards

  

All Other

Stock Awards:

Number of

Shares of

  

Grant Date

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Threshold

($)

  

Target

($)

  

Maximum

($)

  

Threshold

(#)

  

Target

(#)

  

Maximum

(#)

  

Stock or Units

(#)

  

Fair Value of

Stock Awards

 

Scott Montross

 

Non-Equity Award

  -  $371,000  $742,000   -   -   -   -   - 
                                   

Robin Gantt

 

Non-Equity Award

  -   151,867   303,735   -   -   -   -   - 
                                   

Martin Dana

 

Non-Equity Award

  -   154,020   308,040   -   -   -   -   - 
                                   

William Smith

 

Non-Equity Award

  -   154,020   308,040   -   -   -   -   - 
                                   

Vicki Taylor

 

Non-Equity Award

  -   61,146   122,292   -   -   -   -   - 

(1)

These columns show the possible payouts for each named executive officer under the Incentive Plan for 2015 based on the goals set in January 2015. Additional information is included in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, and detail regarding actual awards under the Incentive Plan is reported in the Summary Compensation Table.                                                                                 Shareholders.

 

15


 

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20152020 Fiscal Year End

 

The following table sets forth, for each of the Named Executive Officers, the equity awards made to each such Named Executive Officer that were outstanding atas of December 31, 2015. 2020.

 

 

Option Awards

  

Stock Awards

 
 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)

  

Option

Exercise

  

Option

Expiration

  

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights

That Have Not

   

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards:

Market or

Payout Value of

Unearned

Shares, Units or

Other Rights

That Have Not

  

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Exercisable

  

Unexercisable

  

Price ($)

  

Date

  

Vested (#)

   Vested ($)(1)  

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)

  

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (6)

 

Scott Montross

  -   -   -   -   2,273 (2)  $25,435   8,435 (1) $238,711 
  -   -   -   -   20,462 (3)     228,970   5,624 (2)  159,159 
  -   -   -   -   3,472 (4)     38,852   24,667 (3)  698,076 
  -   -   -   -   15,625 (5)     174,844   8,222 (4)  232,683 
                                   

Robin Gantt

  -   -   -   -   717 (2)     8,023 
  -   -   -   -   6,453 (3)     72,209 
  -   -   -   -   1,150 (4)     12,869 
  -   -   -   -   5,174 (5)     57,897 
                           

Martin Dana

  -   -   -   -   348 (2)     3,894 

Aaron Wilkins

  849 (1)  24,027 
  -   -   -   -   3,139 (3)     35,125   566 (2)  16,018 
  -   -   -   -   1,212 (4)     13,562   7,296 (3)  206,477 
  -   -   -   -   5,455 (5)     61,041   2,432 (4)  68,825 
                                   

William Smith

  -   -   -   -   379 (2)     4,241   2,778 (1)  78,617 
  -   -   -   -   3,410 (3)     38,158   1,852 (2)  52,412 
  -   -   -   -   1,212 (4)     13,562   7,894 (3)  223,400 
  -   -   -   -   5,455 (5)     61,041   2,631 (4)  74,457 
                                   

Vicki Taylor

  -   -   -   -   -      - 

Miles Brittain

  1,157 (1)  32,743 
  772 (2)  21,848 
  7,176 (3)  203,081 
  2,392 (4)  67,693 
        

Eric Stokes

  998 (1)  28,243 
  666 (2)  18,848 
  6,518 (3)  184,459 
  2,173 (4)  61,496 
        

Robin Gantt

  1,876 (5)  53,091 

 

___

(1)

These PSAs were granted on March 26, 2019 and vested on March 31, 2021 based on the Company’s EBITDA Margin Performance over the 2019-2020 fiscal years; the actual number of shares of Common Stock that were issued was determined by multiplying the PSAs by a payout percentage of 126%.

(2)

These RSUs were granted on March 26, 2019. One-half of these RSUs vested on January 15, 2021, and subject to continued employment, one-half of these RSUs will vest on January 17, 2022.

(3)

These PSAs were granted on March 26, 2020 and vest based on the Company’s EBITDA Margin Performance over the measurement period. One-third of these PSAs vested on March 31, 2021 based on EBITDA Margin Performance for the 2020 fiscal year; the actual number of shares of Common Stock that were issued was determined by multiplying the PSAs by a payout percentage of 200%. One-third of these PSAs will vest on March 31, 2022, based on EBITDA Margin Performance for the 2020-2021 fiscal years and one-third of these PSAs will vest on March 31, 2023, based on EBITDA Margin Performance for the 2020-2022 fiscal years.

16

(4)

These RSUs were granted on March 26, 2020. One-third of these RSUs vested on January 15, 2021, and subject to continued employment, one-third of these RSUs will vest on January 17, 2022 and January 16, 2023.

(5)

These RSUs were granted on March 26, 2019 and vested on January 15, 2021 in accordance with Ms. Gantt’s Separation Agreement.

(6)

Market value is based on the closing market price of $11.19$28.30 of our common stockCommon Stock on December 31, 2015.

(2)

These RSUs were granted on May 31, 2013 and vested on January 15, 2016.2020.

 


(3)

These PSAs were granted on May 31, 2013 and 0% vested on January 15, 2016, based upon performance of our Total Shareholder Return from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015.

(4)

These RSUs were granted on May 29, 2014 and vest as follows: 50% on January 15, 2016 and 50% on January 15, 2017.

(5)These PSAs were granted on May 29, 2014 and will vest on January 15, 2017, dependent upon performance of our Total Shareholder Return from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016.     

20152020 Option Exercises and Stock VestingVested

 

The following table sets forth, for each of the Named Executive Officer,Officers, the number of shares acquired upon option exercises and vesting of stock awards during 2015,2020 and the related value realized upon such exercises and vesting.

 

 

Option Awards

  

Stock Awards

  

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Exercise (#)

  

Value

Realized on

Exercise ($)

  

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Vesting (#)(1)

  

Value Realized

on Vesting

($)(2)

  

Number of

Shares Acquired

on Vesting (#)(1)

  

Value Realized on

Vesting ($)(2)

 

Scott Montross

  -   -   10,800  $295,502   25,759  $605,223 

Aaron Wilkins

  2,592   60,901 

William Smith

  8,484   199,335 

Miles Brittain

  3,531   82,957 

Eric Stokes

  3,045   71,539 

Robin Gantt

  -   -   4,934   139,013   8,592   201,875 

Martin Dana

  -   -   2,690   73,927 

William Smith

  -   -   2,712   74,367 

Vicki Taylor

  -   -   -   - 

 

___

(1)

This column shows the number of shares acquired on vesting in 20152020 by the Named Executive Officers. The actual number of shares received by these individuals from shares vested in 20152020 (net of shares used to cover the applicable income taxes, if so elected) was as follows: Mr. Montross – 6,544,15,475, Mr. Wilkins – 1,376, Mr. Smith – 5,097, Mr. Brittain – 2,192, Mr. Stokes – 1,891, and Ms. Gantt – 4,934, Mr. Dana – 1,571 and Mr. Smith – 1,829.4,389.

 

(2)

The value realized on vesting is based on the closing market price multiplied by the number of shares of stock vested on the applicable vesting date.

 


20152020 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

 

The following table sets forth, for each of the Named Executive Officer under our Deferred Compensation Plan, the amounts of the contributions made by each executive, the contributions made by us,Officers, the earnings generated by the investments within the Deferred Compensation Plan, which was frozen in 2016, and the balance of each Named Executive Officer’s account under the Deferred Compensation Plan for the year ended December 31, 2015.2020.

 

Name

 

Executive

Contributions

in Last Fiscal

Year

  

Company

Contributions

in Last Fiscal

Year(1)

  

Aggregate

Earnings

(Loss) in Last

Fiscal Year ($)

  

Aggregate

Balance at

Last Fiscal

Year-End(2)

 

Scott Montross

  -  $71,897  $(510) $103,063 

Robin Gantt

  -   31,427   854   64,364 

Martin Dana

  -   30,741   (2,133)  213,653 

William Smith

  -   31,145   (893)  30,252 

Vicki Taylor

  -   -   -   - 

__

(1)

These contributions are also included in the amounts reported in the All Other Compensation Column of the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)

The following portion of the amounts in the Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year-End column were reported in the Summary Compensation Table of previous years in the Salary column (in the case of executive contributions) or in the All Other Compensation column (in the case of Company contributions), respectively: Mr. Montross - $0 and $0, respectively in 2014 and $0 and $28,055, respectively in 2013; Ms. Gantt - $0 and $0, respectively in 2014 and $0 and $12,692, respectively in 2013.

Name

 

Aggregate

Earnings in

Last Fiscal

Year ($)

  

Aggregate

Withdrawals/

Distributions

($)

  

Aggregate

Balance at Last

Fiscal Year-

End

 

Scott Montross

 $24,043  $(1,000) $172,061 

Aaron Wilkins

  -   -   - 

William Smith

  2,250   -   43,828 

Miles Brittain

  8,078   -   53,193 

Eric Stokes

  -   -   - 

Robin Gantt

  20,244   -   130,471 

 

17

Employment Agreements

 

Employment AgreementsRobin Gantt. On March 30, 2020, the Company entered into a Separation Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Ms. Gantt, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer until April 1, 2020, pursuant to which Ms. Gantt continued to be employed by the Company as a Consultant from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021. The Agreement provided for an annual base salary of $324,480 paid in 24 equal installments, and provided coverage under the Company’s employee benefit plans. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company affirmed the terms of Ms. Gantt’s unvested RSUs to allow the 938 RSUs scheduled to vest on January 15, 2021 to vest as scheduled. In addition, the vesting of the 938 RSUs scheduled to vest on January 17, 2022 was accelerated to also vest on January 15, 2021. The Agreement provided for the forfeiture by Ms. Gantt of any PSAs that were unvested at the time of her resignation. Pursuant to the Agreement, Ms. Gantt was required to comply with certain confidentiality requirements. Ms. Gantt did not previously have an employment agreement with the Company, other than a Change in Control Agreement.

 

We have not entered into any employment agreements with our Named Executive Officers.

Change in Control Agreements

 

We have entered into change in control agreements (the “Agreements”) with certain of our executive officers. The Agreements for each of the Named Executive Officers is for a term ending as indicated below,July 31, 2021, provided that on each respective dateJuly 31, 2021 and each anniversary thereafter, the term of the Agreement will be automatically extended by one year unless either party gives 90 days prior written notice that the term of an agreement shall not be so extended. If a “Change in Control” (as defined in the Agreements and described below) occurs during the term of the Agreements, the Agreements will continue in effect until two years after the Change in Control.

 

Term Ending:

Scott Montross

July 19, 2016

Robin Gantt

April 21, 2016

Martin Dana

October 15, 2016

William Smith

October 15, 2016

Vicki Taylor

October 14, 2016


If an executive officer’s employment is terminated within two years after a Change in Control either by us without “Cause” (as defined in the Agreements and described below) or by the executive officer for “Good Reason” (as defined in the Agreements and described below), the executive officer will be entitled to receive his or hertheir full base salary through the date of termination and any benefits or awards (both cash and stock) that have been earned or are payable through the date of termination plus (i) a lump sum payment equal to two years’ base salary (three years’ base salary in the case of Mr. Montross and one year’s base salary in the case of Ms. Taylor)Messrs. Brittain and Stokes) and (ii) an amount equal to two times the average cash bonuses paid to the executive officer during the previous three years (one(three times the average cash bonuses during the previous three years in the case of Ms. Taylor)Mr. Montross and one times the average cash bonuses during the previous three years in the case of Messrs. Brittain and Stokes). In addition, the executive officer would be entitled to the continuation of health and insurance benefits for certain periods and all outstanding unvested stock optionsequity compensation awards would immediately become fully vested.vested, unless the award provides different vesting terms on a change in control of the Company. In the event that the payments made to an executive officer would be deemed to be a “parachute payment” under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, an executive officer may choose to accept payment of a reduced amount that would not be deemed to be a “parachute payment.” If the payment made to an executive officer is deemed to be a “parachute payment”, the executive officer is responsible for the payment of any resulting taxes.

 

If an executive officer’s employment is terminated within two years after a Change in Control either by us for Cause or as a result of the executive officer’s disability or death, the executive officer will be entitled to receive his or hertheir full base salary through the date of termination plus any benefits or awards (both cash and stock) that have been earned or are payable through the date of termination.

 

For purposes of the Agreements, a “Change in Control” includes (i) any merger or consolidation transaction in which we are notinvolving the surviving corporation,Company, unless our shareholders immediately before such transaction have more than 50% of the same proportionate ownershipcombined voting power of common stockthe outstanding voting securities of the surviving corporation inimmediately after the transaction, (ii) the acquisition by any person of 30 percent20% or more of our total combined voting power, (iii) the liquidation or the sale or other transfer of substantially all of our assets, and (iv) a change in the composition of the Board of Directors during any two-year period such that the directors in office at the beginning of the period and/or their successors who were elected by or on the recommendation of two-thirds of the directors in office at the beginning of the period do not constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors. For purposes of the Agreements, “Good Reason” includes, but is not limited to, (i) an adverse change in the executive officer’s status, title, position(s), or responsibilities or the assignment to the executive of duties or responsibilities which are inconsistent with the executive officer’s status, title, or position, (ii) a reduction in the executive officer’s base salary or the failure to pay compensation otherwise due to the executive officer, (iii) a requirement that the executive officer be based anywhere other than within ten25 miles of his or hertheir job location before the Change in Control, (iv) our failure to continue any compensation or employee benefit plan or program in effect before the Change in Control or any act or omission that would adversely affect the executive officer’s continued participation in any such plan or program or materially reduce the benefits under such plan or program, and (v) our failure to require any of our successors to assume our obligations under the Agreements within 30 days after a Change in Control.Control, and (vi) any material breach of the Agreements by the Company. For purposes of the Agreements, “Cause” means the willful and continued failure to satisfactorily perform the duties assigned to the executive officer within a certain period after notice of such failure is given and commission of certain illegal conduct.

 


18

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

The following table shows estimates of the potential payments to Named Executive Officers upon terminationif employment is terminated after a Change in Control either by us without Cause or by the executive officer for the reasons described below.Good Reason. The amounts shown assume that the employment of each executive was terminated effective as of December 31, 2015. 2020. The table does not quantify benefits under plans that are generally available to salaried employees and do not discriminate in favor of Named Executive Officers, including the payment of accrued but unpaid salary, accrued but unused vacation pay, and benefits accrued under the qualified 401(k) defined contribution plan payable upon termination.

 

Executive Benefits and Payments

Upon Termination

 

Termination

Without Cause or

Voluntary

Termination for

Good Reason

  

Termination

Without Cause or

Voluntary

Termination for

Good Reason, after

a Change in

Control

  

Termination For

Cause or

Voluntary

Termination

Without Good

Reason

  

Termination as a

Result of

Disability or

Death

 

Scott Montross

                

Base Salary

  -  $1,590,000   -   - 

Bonus

  -   75,313   -   - 

Health and Insurance Benefits

  -   50,000   -   - 

Earned Vacation

 $60,000   60,000  $60,000  $60,000 
                 

Robin Gantt

                

Base Salary

  -   624,000   -   - 

Bonus

  -   31,137   -   - 

Health and Insurance Benefits

  -   32,000   -   - 

Earned Vacation

  33,000   33,000   33,000   33,000 
                 

Martin Dana

                

Base Salary

  -   616,080   -   - 

Bonus

  -   13,917   -   - 

Health and Insurance Benefits

  -   50,000   -   - 

Earned Vacation

  32,000   32,000   32,000   32,000 
                 

William Smith

                

Base Salary

  -   616,080   -   - 

Bonus

  -   50,051   -   - 

Health and Insurance Benefits

  -   31,000   -   - 

Earned Vacation

  35,000   35,000   35,000   35,000 
                 

Vicki Taylor

                

Base Salary

  -   222,000   -   - 

Bonus

  -   -   -   - 

Health and Insurance Benefits

  -   3,000   -   - 

Earned Vacation

  19,000   19,000   19,000   19,000 

Name

 

Base Salary

  

Bonus

  

Equity

Incentive Plan

Awards (1)

  

Health and

Insurance

Benefits

 

Scott Montross

 $1,752,975  $1,179,027  $1,952,303  $84,000 

Aaron Wilkins

  610,000   280,757��  493,863   31,000 

William Smith

  653,598   332,916   628,742   32,000 

Miles Brittain

  300,000   144,654   502,042   20,000 

Eric Stokes

  250,000   140,807   453,309   27,000 

 

(1)

The PSAs and RSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2020 were granted on March 26, 2019 and March 26, 2020. The PSAs for the 2019-2020 measurement period vested on March 31, 2021; the actual number of shares of Common Stock that were issued was determined by multiplying the PSAs by a payout percentage of 126%. The PSAs for the 2020 measurement period vested on March 31, 2021; the actual number of shares of Common Stock that were issued was determined by multiplying the PSAs by a payout percentage of 200%. The PSAs for the 2020-2021 and 2020-2022 measurement periods will vest on March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2023, respectively; the estimated number of shares of Common Stock that would be issued was determined by multiplying the PSAs by a payout percentage of 200%. Amounts are calculated based on the price of $28.30, the closing market price for the Company’s Common Stock on December 31, 2020.

Pay Ratio Disclosure

 

Pursuant to Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S‑K, a public company is required to disclose the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of a registrant (excluding the CEO), the annual total compensation of that registrant’s CEO, and the ratio of the median of the annual total compensation of all employees to the annual total compensation of the CEO.

 

In determining the median employee, a listing was prepared of the total annual cash compensation of each individual who was employed by us on December 31, 2020, the last day of our payroll year (whether employed on a full-time, part-time, or seasonal basis). We did not make any assumptions, adjustments, or estimates with respect to total cash compensation, and we did not annualize the compensation for any full-time employees that were not employed by us for all of 2020. After identifying the median employee, we calculated annual total compensation for such employee using the same methodology we use for our Named Executive Officers as set forth in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table on page 14.

The annual total compensation for 2020 for our CEO was $1,962,273, and for the median employee was $65,510. The resulting ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to the median employee’s annual total compensation was 30 to 1.

The SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and various assumptions and, as a result, the pay ratio reported by us may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported by other companies.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

Messrs. Declusin andFranson, Larson, and Ms. ApplebaumPaschal served on the Compensation Committee in 2015.2020. All members of the Committee were independent directors, and no member has ever been an officer or employee of the Company. During 2015,2020, none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee (or its equivalent) or board of directors of another entity whose executive officer served on our Compensation Committee.

 

19


 

Compensation Committee Report

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the full Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the proxy statementthis Proxy Statement for filing with the SEC.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Keith Larson, Chairman

  Michelle Applebaum
 

Michael Franson, Chairperson

Keith Larson

James Declusin

John Paschal

 

20


 

ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

(Proposal No.2)

 

In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Board of Directors is asking shareholders to approve an advisory resolution on executive compensation. The advisory vote is a non-binding vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies, and practices described in this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. The text of the resolution is as follows:

 

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Northwest Pipe Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20162021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the executive compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and narrative disclosure."

 

The Company urges you to read the disclosure under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” which begins on page 98 and discusses how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy. You should also read the Summary Compensation Table and other related compensation tables and narrative disclosure which provide additional details about the compensation of our CEO, our CFO and our three other most highly-compensated executive officersNamed Executive Officers for 2015.2020. We have designed our executive compensation structure to attract, retain, and motivate executives who can accomplish our business strategy, and whose interests are aligned with those of our shareholders. We believe that our executive compensation program does not encourage excessive and unnecessary risk-taking by our executives but, rather, encourages our executives to remain focused on both the short-term and long-term operational and financial goals of the Company.

 

While we intend to carefully consider the voting results of this proposal, the final vote is advisory in nature and therefore not binding on the Company, our Board of Directors, or the Compensation Committee.

 

We currently hold our advisory vote on executive compensation annually. Accordingly, the next advisory vote on executive compensation will be held at our 20172022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR”the approval of the compensation of the Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this proxy statement and as described above pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Exchange Act.FORTHE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND AS DESCRIBED ABOVE PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.

 

21


 

Director CompensationDIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

The Compensation Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors the level and form of compensation and benefits for directors. In 2012, Mercer was engaged to conductMr. Montross, as a review of our director compensation program. Membersmember of the Board of Directors who areis also our employees doemployee, does not receive additional compensation for serving as directors. Eachdirector. For nonemployee director receives a $30,000 annual retainer, $2,000 for each Board meeting attended and $500 for each meeting of a committee of the Board attended. The Lead Director receives an additional retainer of $18,000. The Audit Committee Chairman receives an additional annual retainer of $7,500, anddirectors, the Compensation Committee Chairman and Nominating and Governance Committee Chairman each receive an additional annual retainerhas approved the following director compensation as of $5,000. December 31, 2020:

Chairperson of the Board annual retainer

 $110,000 

Annual retainer, except for Chairperson of the Board

 $40,000 

Lead Director

 $20,000 

Audit Committee Chairperson

 $15,750 

Audit Committee non-chair member

 $5,000 

Compensation Committee Chairperson

 $10,000 

Compensation Committee non-chair member

 $3,000 

Nominating and Governance Committee Chairperson

 $7,500 

Nominating and Governance Committee non-chair member

 $1,500 

In addition, each nonemployee director receives an annual award of $55,000, which has historically been payable in cash, shares of the Company’s Common Stock, or a combination thereof, at each director’s election. In 2015, the award was$65,000 payable solely in shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The members of our Board of Directors are also reimbursed for travel expenses incurred in attending board meetings.

 

Mr. Roman serves as the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors pursuant to an Executive Employment Agreement, dated effective as of January 1, 2013 (the “Roman Executive Employment Agreement”).  The Roman Executive Employment Agreement, as amended effective January 1, 2014, provides that Mr. Roman’s annual base salary will be $150,000, and that he will no longer continue to vest in any bonus or incentive awards made to him before January 1, 2013, with the exception of the awards which vested on January 1, 2014. Mr. Roman also will not be eligible to participate in any of the other employee benefit plans that are generally available to the Company’s employees, with the exception of the medical and dental plans. The Roman Executive Employment Agreement may be terminated by either Mr. Roman or the Company upon sixty days written notice. The Roman Executive Employment Agreement will also terminate in the event of Mr. Roman’s death or disability. Upon termination of the Roman Executive Employment Agreement for any reason, the Company will be required to pay Mr. Roman’s base salary through the date of termination. The Roman Executive Employment Agreement also includes standard confidentiality, non-solicitation and nondisclosure provisions.

Director Compensation Table.Table. The following table reflects compensation earned by the directors for the year ended December 31, 2015,2020, with the exception of Mr. Montross, our CEO, whose compensation is included in the Summary of Cash and Certain Other Compensation table above.on page 14.

 

Name(1)

 

Fees Earned

or Paid in

Cash

  

Stock

Awards(2)

  

All Other Compensation

  

Total

 

Michelle Applebaum

 $48,500  $55,000   -  $103,500 

James Declusin

  68,000   55,000   -   123,000 

Harry Demorest

  55,000   55,000   -   110,000 

Keith Larson

  53,500   55,000   -   108,500 

Richard Roman

  150,000   -  $792 (3)  150,792 


Name

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash

  

Stock Awards (1)

  

Total

 

Michelle Applebaum (2)

 $26,250  $-  $26,250 

Michael Franson

  75,000   65,000   140,000 

Amanda Kulesa (3)

  20,750   65,000   85,750 

Keith Larson

  58,750   65,000   123,750 

John Paschal

  47,875   65,000   112,875 

Richard Roman

  110,000   65,000   175,000 

William Yearsley (4)

  34,875   125,000   159,875 

 

(1)

As of December 31, 2015, each director had the following number of options outstanding: Ms. Applebaum – 0; Mr. Declusin – 0; Mr. Demorest – 0; Mr. Larson – 0; Mr. Roman –28,000.

(2)(1)

On June 4, 2015, 2,6162020, 2,563 shares of Common Stock were granted to Messrs. Franson, Larson, Paschal, Roman, and Yearsley. On September 10, 2020, 2,406 shares of Common Stock were granted to Ms. ApplebaumKulesa, and Messrs. Declusin, Demorest, and Larson.2,221 shares of Common Stock were granted to Mr. Yearsley. The amount included in this column represents the amount recognized by us in 20152020 for financial statement reporting purposes for the fair value of the common stockCommon Stock awarded. The assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value for the stock awards are in Note 1113 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II – Item 8,8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of our 20152020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.to Shareholders.

 

(2)

Ms. Applebaum retired from the Board of Directors on June 4, 2020 at the expiration of her term as a director of the Company.

(3)

Amount includes payments by us for Ms. Kulesa was elected to the Board of Directors on July 7, 2020.

(4)

Mr. Roman’s life insurance premiums.Yearsley was elected to the Board of Directors on March 26, 2020.

 

22


 

Audit Committee ReportAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Audit Committee reports to and acts on behalf of the Board of Directors and is comprised solely of directors who satisfy the independence, financial literacy, and other requirements set forth in the listing rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market and applicable securities laws. In addition, Messrs. Franson, Larson, and Yearsley are each of the three current members of the Audit Committee is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC.

 

The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors, which sets forth its duties and responsibilities. This charter, which is available in full on the Company’s website atwww.nwpipe.com under “Investor Relations” - “Corporate Governance”, is reviewed annually and updated, as appropriate, to address changes in regulatory requirements, authoritative guidance, evolving oversight practices, and investor feedback.

 

The Audit Committee'sCommittee’s primary duties and responsibilities are the oversight and monitoring of:

The integrity of the Company's financial reporting process, financial internal control systems, accounting and legal compliance and financial reporting of the Company.

The qualifications, independence and performance of the Company's independent auditors.

The compliance by the Company with applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

The maintenance of an open and private, if necessary, communication among the independent auditors, management, legal counsel and the Board.

the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting process, financial internal control systems, accounting and legal compliance, and financial reporting of the Company;

the qualifications, independence, and performance of the Company’s independent auditors;

the compliance by the Company with applicable legal and regulatory requirements; and

the maintenance of an open and private, if necessary, communication among the independent auditors, management, legal counsel, and the Board of Directors.

 

Management is responsible for preparing the Company’s financial statements and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and issuing a report thereon, and for performing an independent audit of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. In this context, the Audit Committee performed the following:

 

met with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), who has served as our independent registered public accountants since 2012, with and without management present, to review and discuss the Company’s audited financial statements and assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;

asked management and PwC questions relating to such matters and discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), including Statement on Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees”;

reviewed the terms of the audit engagement, the overall audit strategy, timing of the audit and significant risks identified; and

reviewed the critical accounting policies and practices applied by the Company in preparation of its financial statements, and critical accounting estimates and significant unusual transactions affecting the Company’s financial statements.

met with Moss Adams LLP (“Moss Adams”), who has served as our independent registered public accountants since 2016, with and without management present, to review and discuss the Company’s audited financial statements and assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

asked management and Moss Adams questions relating to such matters and discussed with Moss Adams the matters required to be discussed by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), including Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees”;

reviewed the terms of the audit engagement, the overall audit strategy, timing of the audit, and significant risks identified; and


reviewed the critical accounting policies and practices applied by the Company in preparation of its financial statements, and critical accounting estimates and significant unusual transactions affecting the Company’s financial statements.

 

Based on the reviews and discussions described in this report, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K10‑K for the year ended December 31, 20152020 for filing with the SEC.

23

 

The Audit Committee’s responsibilities also include monitoring the qualifications, independence, and performance of the Company'sCompany’s independent auditors. In reviewing the auditor’s performance, the Audit Committee considers the quality and efficiency of the services provided by the audit team, and reviews and discusses the auditor’s most recent PCAOB inspection report and its system of quality control. The Committee also reviews and discusses proposed staffing levels and the selection of the lead engagement partner from the independent registered public accounting firm. Further, the Audit Committee recognizes the importance of maintaining the independence of the Company’s auditor, both in fact and in appearance. In 2015,For 2020, the Audit Committee received and reviewed the written disclosures and letter provided by PwCMoss Adams as required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with the independent accountants that firm’s independence. The Audit Committee concurs with PwC’sMoss Adams’ conclusion that they are independent from the Company and its management.

 

Respectfully submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

 

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Harry Demorest, Chairman

  Michelle Applebaum

Keith Larson, Chairperson

Michael Franson

William Yearsley

 

24


 

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Disclosure of Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Fees for services billed by the Company’s principal accountant, PricewaterhouseCoopersMoss Adams LLP, for the years ended December 31, 20152020 and 20142019 were as follows:

 

 

2015

  

2014

 
         

2020

  

2019

 

Audit fees(1)

 $1,000,200  $1,325,500  $1,132,500  $820,000 

Audit-related fees

  -   -   -   - 

Tax fees(2)

  12,100   20,400 

Tax fees

  -   - 

All Other fees

  -   -   -   - 
                

Total fees

 $1,012,300  $1,345,900  $1,132,500  $820,000 

 

 

(1)

Audit fees include fees for audits of the annual financial statements, including required quarterly reviews, and the audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.reporting, and services in connection with other regulatory filings. In addition, we reimbursed PwC $33,000 and $37,000 for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of their services of approximately $21,400 and $19,900 to Moss Adams LLP for the years ended December 31, 20152020 and 2014,2019, respectively.

 

(2)

Tax fees represent fees for assistance with international income tax compliance and advice.

Pre-approval PProcessrocess

 

To help assure independence of the independent auditors, the Audit Committee has established a process for the pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditor; provided, however, that de minimis services may instead be approved by the CEO or the CFO. One hundred percentAll of the fees shown in the principal accountant fees schedule for 20152020 and 20142019 were approved by the Audit Committee.in accordance with this policy.

 

25


 

RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF

MOSS ADAMSLLP

(Proposal No.3)

 

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our financial statements (taking into account the vote on shareholder ratification).statements. While we are not required by our bylaws or other governing documents or law to seek shareholder ratification of the appointment of Moss Adams LLP (“Moss Adams”) as our independent registered public accounting firm, we are doing so as a matter of good corporate governance. If the shareholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will take the vote into consideration when determining whether or not to retain Moss Adams.Adams LLP. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if they determine that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

 

On December 11, 2015, the Audit Committee dismissed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm effective upon the issuance by PwC of its reports on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015 to be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for that fiscal year, and appointed Moss Adams as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2016.

PwC’s audit reports on the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 did not contain any adverse opinions or disclaimers of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and during the subsequent interim period through March 4, 2016, there were no disagreements between the Company and PwC on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PwC, would have caused PwC to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in their reports on the Company's consolidated financial statements for such years. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and during the subsequent interim period through March 4, 2016 there were no "reportable events" as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K that occurred or were identified, except as follows: As previously reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, management identified a control deficiency that constituted a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. Specifically, the Company did not design and maintain effective controls over the impairment assessment of goodwill. The Company did not design and maintain effective controls related to the critical review of assumptions, data inputs and results of the goodwill impairment analysis, and the identification of changes in events and circumstances that indicate it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment has occurred between annual impairment tests. The material weakness was remediated during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.


The Audit Committee and management discussed the material weakness in internal control described above with PwC and authorized PwC to respond fully to any inquiries about the Company’s material weakness over financial reporting as may be made by the Company’s successor independent registered public accounting firm. On December 16, 2015, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (the “Form 8-K”) with the SEC reporting the dismissal of PwC. The Company provided PwC with a copy of the Form 8-K and requested that PwC furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not PwC agreed with the statements made in the Form 8-K.  A copy of PwC’s letter dated December 16, 2015 was filed with the SEC as an exhibit to the Form 8-K.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and the subsequent interim period through March 4, 2016, neither the Company nor anyone acting on its behalf has consulted with Moss Adams on any of the matters or events set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or 304(a)(2)(ii) of Regulation SK.

In selecting Moss Adams as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for 2016, the Audit Committee considered a number of factors, including:

the professional qualifications of Moss Adams and its employees,

the independence of Moss Adams, and its processes for maintaining independence,

the expertise and capabilities of Moss Adams in handling the Company’s audit, and

the appropriateness of Moss Adams’s fees (on both an absolute basis and as compared to its peer firms).

The Audit Committee believes that the continued retention of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accountants is in the best interests of our shareholders.

 

Representatives of Moss Adams LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will be given an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS VOTING “FOR”FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE AUDIT COMMCOMMITTEEITTEE’SS APPOINTMENT OF MOSS ADAMSLLP AS THE COMPANY’SCOMPANYS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEARENDING DECEMBER31, 20162021..

 

26


 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

During 2015,Since January 1, 2020, there has not been any transaction or series of transactions to which we were or are to be a party in which the Company engaged Raymond James & Associates, an affiliateamount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer, or holder of Eagle Asset Management, to provide investment banking services related tomore than 5% of our Common Stock, or members of any such person’s immediate family, had or will have a possible disposition ofdirect or indirect material interest, other than compensation arrangements with the Company’s Tubular Products business. Eagle Asset Management was a substantial stockholder of the Company (owning more than ten percent of the Company’s common stock) until September 30, 2015, when Eagle Asset Management reported that it then owned less than 5 percent of the Company’s common stock. A nominal amount of reimbursable expenses were incurred by Raymond James during 2015. Professional fees payable to Raymond James will be contingent upon completion of a future transaction, which may or may not occur.executive officers and directors, all on terms described under “Executive Compensation” above.

 

The Audit Committee is responsible for the review and approval of all related party transactions. Although the Audit Committee does not have written policies and procedures with respect to the review of related party transactions, we intend that any such transactions will be reviewed by the Audit Committee, which will consider all relevant facts and circumstances and will take in to account, among other factors:

 

whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances;

whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances;

 

whether the transaction would impair the independence of an outside director; and

whether the transaction would impair the independence of an outside director; and

 

whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any director or executive officer of the Company.

whether the transaction would present an improper conflict of interest for any director or executive officer of the Company.

 

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE16(a) REPORTS

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended requires the Company’s directors, and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class10% of the Company’s equity securities,Common Stock to file initialwith the SEC reports showing ownership of and changes of ownership and reportsin shares of changes in ownership of shares with the SEC. Such persons also are required to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Company’s Common Stock. Based solely on itsa review of the copies of suchthese reports received by us with respect to 2015, orand written representations from certain reporting persons,the directors and executive officers, we believe that all of our directors and executive officers complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable tofor 2020, except that the Form 4 for our directors, officers and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities have been complied with for 2015, with the exception of the following; (i) untimely Form 4s were filed for Messrs. Baum, Dana, Mahoney, Montross, and Smith andformer board member Ms. Gantt on January 20, 2015, which should have beenApplebaum filed on JanuaryJune 5, 2015, each with respect to the vesting of RSUs and PSAs and the withholding of a portion of the shares to cover the applicable income taxes, and (ii) an untimely Form 42020 was filed for Mr. Demorest on November 12, 2015, which amended the number of shares acquired and beneficially owned following a transaction on May 26, 2015.not timely filed.

 

27


 

STOCK OWNED BY MANAGEMENT AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

 

The table below sets forth certain information, as of April 18, 2016,9, 2021 except as otherwise noted, regarding the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock by: (i) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of its outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each of the Named Executive Officers, (iii) each of the Company’s directors and director nominees, and (iv) all directors, director nominees, and executive officers as a group. The address of each of the Named Executive Officers and directors is c/o Northwest Pipe Company, 5721 SE Columbia Way,201 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 200,100, Vancouver, Washington 98661. 98684.

 

  

Shares Beneficially

Owned(1)

 
  

Shares

  

Percent

 

Certain Beneficial Owners:

        

Royce & Associates LLC(2)

  1,221,467   12.8%

745 Fifth Avenue

        

New York, NY 10151

        

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(3)

  690,812   7.2%

Building One

        

6300 Bee Cave Road

        

Austin, TX 78746

        

William Blair Investment Management, LLC(4)

  663,004   6.9%

222 W. Adams St.

        

Chicago, IL 60606

        

BlackRock, Inc.(5)

  580,408   6.1%

55 East 52nd Street

        

New York, NY 10022

        

Directors and Nominees:

        

Michelle Applebaum

  4,126   * 

James Declusin

  11,384   * 

Harry Demorest

  16,826   * 

Keith Larson

  9,037   * 

Richard Roman

  72,646   * 

Named Executive Officers:

        

Scott Montross

  26,254   * 

Robin Gantt

  18,622   * 

Martin Dana

  8,689   * 

William Smith

  6,843   * 

Vicki Taylor

  -   * 

All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons):

  174,427   1.8%


  

Shares Beneficially

Owned (1)

 
  

Shares

  

Percent

 

Certain Beneficial Owners:

        

Royce & Associates, LP (2)

  1,027,554   10.4

%

745 Fifth Avenue

        

New York, NY 10151

        

BlackRock, Inc. (3)

  811,758   8.2

%

55 East 52nd Street

        

New York, NY 10055

        

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (4)

  795,340   8.1

%

Building One

        

6300 Bee Cave Road

        

Austin, TX 78746

        

Directors and Nominees:

        

Michael Franson

  17,211   * 

Amanda Kulesa

  2,406   * 

Keith Larson

  26,313   * 

John Paschal

  4,715   * 

Richard Roman

  42,457   * 

William Yearsley

  4,784   * 

Named Executive Officers:

        

Scott Montross

  94,274   1.0 

Aaron Wilkins

  9,402   * 

William Smith

  33,782   * 

Miles Brittain

  12,965   * 

Eric Stokes

  7,626��  * 

Robin Gantt

  10,805   * 

All directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons):

  266,740   2.7

%

 

(*)

Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent of the outstanding Common Stock.

 

(1)

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and includes voting power and investment power with respect to shares. Shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options that are currently exercisable or become exercisable within 60 days from April 18, 2016 are considered outstanding for the purpose of calculating each person’s percentage of Common Stock owned, but not for the purpose of calculating the percentage of Common Stock owned by any other person. The number of stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of April 18, 2016 is as follows: Ms. Applebaum – 0; Mr. Dana – 0; Mr. Declusin – 0; Mr. Demorest – 0; Ms. Gantt – 0; Mr. Montross – 0; Mr. Larson – 0; Mr. Roman – 28,000; Mr. Smith – 0; Ms. Taylor – 0; and all directors and executive officers as a group – 28,000.

 

(2)

The information as to beneficial ownership is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by Royce & Associates, LLCLP on January 20, 2016,6, 2021, reflecting its beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2015.2020. The Schedule 13G/A states Royce & Associates, LLCLP has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 1,221,4671,027,554 shares of Common Stock.

 

(3)

The information as to beneficial ownership is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. on January 29, 2021, reflecting its beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2020. The Schedule 13G/A states BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 801,459 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 811,758 shares of Common Stock.

(3)(4)

The information as to beneficial ownership is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP on February 9, 2016,12, 2021, reflecting its beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2015.2020. The Schedule 13G/A states Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting power with respect to 663,150758,417 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 690,812 shares of Common Stock.

(4)

The information as to beneficial ownership is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by William Blair Investment Management, LLC on February 9, 2016, reflecting its beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2015. The Schedule 13G states William Blair Investment Management, LLC has sole voting power with respect to 564,450 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 663,004 shares of Common Stock.

(5)

The information as to beneficial ownership is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. on January 27, 2016, reflecting its beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2015. The Schedule 13G/A states BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 566,680 shares of Common Stock and sole dispositive power with respect to 580,408795,340 shares of Common Stock.

 

28


 

DATE FOR SUBMISSION OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

Pursuant to Rule 14a-814a‑8 under the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, some shareholder proposals may be eligible for inclusion in the Company’s 20162021 proxy statement. Any such proposal must be received by the Company not later than December 30, 2016.24, 2021 for the 2022 Annual Meeting. Shareholders interested in submitting such a proposal are advised to contact knowledgeable counsel with regard to the detailed requirements of the applicable securities law. The submission of a shareholder proposal does not guarantee that it will be included in the Company’s proxy statement. Alternatively, under the Company’s bylaws, a proposal or nomination that a shareholder does not seek to include in the Company’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-814a‑8 may be delivered to the Secretary of the Company not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of an annual meeting, unless notice or public disclosure of the date of the meeting occurs less than 60 days prior to the date of such meeting, in which event, shareholders may deliver such notice not later than the 10thtenth day following the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure thereof was made. A shareholder’s submission must include certain specified information concerning the proposal or nominee, as the case may be, and information as to the shareholder’s ownership of Common Stock of the Company. Proposals or nominations not meeting these requirements will not be entertained at the annual meeting. If the shareholder does not also comply with the requirements of Rule 14a-4(c)14a‑4(c)(2) under the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, the Company may exercise discretionary voting authority under proxies it solicits to vote in accordance with its best judgment on any such proposal or nomination submitted by a shareholder.

 

OTHER MATTERS

 

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board of Directors does not know of any other matters to be presented for action by the shareholders at the 20162021 Annual Meeting. If, however, any other matters not now known are properly brought before the meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy will vote such proxy in accordance with the determination of a majority of the Board of Directors.

 

29


 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY MATERIALS AND THE ANNUAL MEETING

 

Although we encourage you to read this Proxy Statement in its entirety, we include this question and answer section to provide some background information and brief answers to several questions you might have about the Annual Meeting.

 

Q:

Why is the Company providing these materials?

 

A:

The Company’s Board of Directors is providing these proxy materials to you in connection with the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will take place virtually via webcast on Thursday, June 2, 2016,10, 2021, at 8:7:00 a.m. (local time) at the Hilton Vancouver Hotel, located at 301 West 6th Street, Vancouver, Washington.Pacific Time. Shareholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

 

Q:

Where will the Annual Meeting be held and how can I attend?

A:

The Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting, which will be conducted via live webcast. While there will be no physical location, shareholders may participate by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NWPX2021. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need your unique 16‑digit control number printed in the box and marked by the arrow on your proxy card or on the voting instructions from your stockbroker, bank, or other nominee that accompanied your proxy materials. If you lose your unique 16‑digit control number in advance of the Annual Meeting, you may join the Annual Meeting as a “Guest”, even without your 16‑digit control number, by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NWPX2021, but you will not be able to vote or ask questions. Attendees will be required to comply with meeting guidelines and procedures available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NWPX2021.

Access to the webcast will open approximately fifteen minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting to allow time for you to log in and test your computer audio system. The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets, and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Participants should ensure that they have a strong Wi‑Fi connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time.

Assistance with questions regarding how to attend and participate via the Internet will be provided at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NWPX2021 on the day of the Annual Meeting. Webcast replay of the Annual Meeting will be available shortly after the meeting at www.nwpipe.com.

Q:

Why hold a virtual meeting?

A:

As part of our effort to encourage broader participation in the Annual Meeting, as well as maintain a safe and healthy environment for our directors, members of management, and shareholders in light of the COVID‑19 pandemic, we believe that hosting a virtual meeting is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders. Virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting constitutes presence in person under our Bylaws.

Q:

Will you hold the Annual Meeting of Shareholders virtually next year?

A:

We will decide whether to hold the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders virtually, in person, or a combination of both once we weigh the benefits and detriments of virtual and in-person meetings following this year’s Annual Meeting.

Q:

What information is contained in these materials?

 

A:

The information included in this Proxy Statement relates to the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, the compensation of directors and our most highly paid officers, and other required information.

 

30

Q:

What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

There are three proposals scheduled to be voted on at the Annual Meeting:

 

the election of three members of the Board of Directors (Proposal No. 1);

the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal No. 2); and

the ratification of the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2021 (Proposal No. 3).

We will also consider other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting.

the election of two members of the Board of Directors (Proposal No. 1);

 

Q:

the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal No. 2); and

the ratification of the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016 (Proposal No. 3).

We will also consider other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting.

Q:

How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote?

 

A:

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote your shares “FOR” the election of the Board’s nominees for election to the Board of Directors, “FOR” the advisory vote on executive compensation, and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Moss Adams LLP.

 

Q:

What shares owned by me can be voted?

 

A:

All shares of the Company’s Common Stock owned by you as of the close of business on April 15, 20169, 2021 (the “Record Date”) may be voted by you. You may cast one vote per share of Common Stock that you held on the Record Date. These shares include shares that are: (i) held directly in your name as the shareholder of record, and (ii) held for you as the beneficial owner through a stockbroker, bank, or other nominee.

 


Q:

What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

 

A:

Most of the Company’s shareholders hold their shares through a stockbroker, bank, or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Shareholder of Record

If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered the shareholder of record of those shares and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by the Company. As the shareholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the Company or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. You may also vote your shares as described below under “How can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?” You are also entitled to attend the Annual Meeting and to vote electronically, as described below under “How can I vote my shares at the Annual Meeting?” 

 

Beneficial Owner

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee who is considered the shareholder of record of those shares. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker on how to vote and are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a legal proxy from your broker or other nominee authorizing you to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting.vote. Your broker or nominee has sent you instructions fora voting instruction form, instead of a proxy card, that describes how you can direct the broker or nominee to vote your shares. You may submit voting instructions by Internet or telephone, or you may complete and mail a voting instruction form in the enclosed prepaid and addressed envelope. You may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote electronically, as described below under “How can I vote my shares at the Annual Meeting?”

31

 

Q:

How can I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

Shares held directly inYou mayvote your name as the shareholder of record may be voted in person atshares online during the Annual Meeting. IfTo vote, you choose to do so, please bringwill need your unique 16‑digit control number printed in the box and marked by the arrow on your proxy card or proof of identification. on the voting instructions from your stockbroker, bank, or other nominee that accompanied your proxy materials. Instructions on how to vote while participating at the meeting live via the Internet are posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NWPX2021. Virtual attendance at our Annual Meeting constitutes presence in person under our Bylaws.

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, the Company recommends that you vote your shares in advance as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

Q:

Shares held in street name may be voted in person by you only

What if you obtain a legal proxy fromduring the record holder (your broker, bankcheck-in time or other nominee) giving youduring the right to voteAnnual Meeting I have technical difficulties or trouble accessing the shares.virtual meeting website?

 

Q:A:

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual meeting webcast. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting webcast during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting login page.

Q:

How can I vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

To vote shares held directly in your name as the shareholder of record, without attending the meeting, please sign, date, and return the enclosed proxy card, or follow the instructions for Internet or telephone voting on the enclosed proxy card. This way your shares will be represented whether or not you are able to attend the meeting.

To vote shares held in street name, without attending the meeting, please follow the instructions provided by your broker.


Q:

Can I change my vote?

 

Q:

Can I change my vote?

A:

You may change your proxy instructions at any time prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting. You may accomplish this by entering a new vote by Internet, by telephone, by delivering a written notice of revocation to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, by granting a new proxy card or new voting instruction card bearing a later date (which automatically revokes the earlier proxy instructions), or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.electronically live via the Internet. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously granted proxy to be revoked unless you specifically so request. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker or other nominee authorizing you to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting.meeting.

 

Q:

How are votes counted?

 

A:

In the election of directors, you may vote “FOR” or “WITHHOLD AUTHORITY” from voting for each of the director nominees. If you vote your shares without providing specific instructions, your shares will be voted “FOR” the nominees for election to the Board of Directors. If you vote to “WITHHOLD AUTHORITY” to vote for a nominee for election as a director, the shares represented will be counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum, but they will not be counted and will have no effect in determining whether the nominee is elected (though it may influence whether such nominee is asked to resign in accordance with our Corporate Governance Principles).

With respect to the proposals for the advisory vote on executive compensation and the ratification of the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, you may vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN.” If you vote your shares without providing specific instructions, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.Board of Directors. If you vote to “ABSTAIN”, the shares represented will be counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum, but with respect to any proposal on which there was a vote to “ABSTAIN” they will not be counted and will have no effect in determining whether the proposal is approved.

32

 

If you hold shares beneficially in street name and do not provide your broker with voting instructions, your shares may constitute “broker non-votes.” Generally, broker non-votes occur on a matter when a broker is not permitted to vote on that matter without instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not given. In tabulating the voting result for any particular proposal, shares that constitute broker non-votes are not considered entitled to vote or votes cast on that proposal. Thus, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the meeting, assuming that a quorum is obtained.


 

Under the rules that govern brokers who have record ownership of shares that are held in street name for their clients, brokers have discretion to vote these shares on routine matters but not on non-routine matters. Thus, if you do not otherwise instruct your broker, the broker may turn in a proxy card voting your shares “FOR” routine matters but expressly instructing that the broker is not voting on non-routine matters. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker expressly instructs on a proxy card that the broker is not voting on a matter, whether routine or non-routine. Proposal No. 3 (ratification of Moss Adams LLP) is considered a routine matter, so unless you have provided otherwise, your broker will have discretionary authority to vote your shares on this proposal. Proposals No. 1 (election of directors) and 2 (advisory vote on executive compensation) are considered non-routine matters, so unless you have provided instructions to your broker with respect to Proposals No. 1 and 2, your broker will not have authority to vote your shares on any of those proposals and your shares will constitute broker non-votes. Broker non-votes are counted for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum but are not counted for determining the number of shares entitled to vote or votes cast for or against a proposal.

Q:

What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

The quorum requirement for holding the Annual Meeting and transacting business is a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to be voted. The shares may be present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. Virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting constitutes presence in person for quorum purposes at the meeting.

 

Q:

What is the voting requirement to approve the proposals?

 

A:

Proposal No. 1:The proposal for the election of the director nominees requires the affirmative “FOR” vote of a plurality of the votes cast in the election.

Proposal No. 2: The proposal for the advisory vote on executive compensation requires the affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal.

Proposal No. 3: The proposal for the ratification of the appointment of Moss Adams LLP for the year ending December 31, 20162021 requires the affirmative “FOR” vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal.

 

Q:

Who are the proxyholders and what do they do?

 

A:

The two personspeople named as proxyholders on the proxy card, Scott Montross, our President and CEO, and Richard Roman, our ChairmanChairperson of the Board, were designated by the Board of Directors. The proxyholders will vote all properly tendered proxies (except to the extent that authority to vote has been withheld) and where a choice has been specified by you as provided in the proxy card, it will be voted in accordance with the instructions you indicate on the proxy card. If you vote your shares without providing specific instructions regarding each of the proposals, your shares will be voted on each proposal as recommended by the Board of Directors.

 


Q:

What does it mean if I receive more than one set of proxy materials?

 

A:

You may receive more than one set of proxy materials. For example, if you hold your shares in more than one brokerage account, you may receive a separate set of proxy materials for each brokerage account in which you hold shares. If you are a shareholder of record and your shares are registered in more than one name, you will receive more than one set of proxy materials. Please vote your shares for each set of proxy materials that you receive by following the instructions on the enclosed proxy card.

 

33

Q:

How may I request multiple sets of proxy materials if two or more shareholders reside in my household?

 

A:

To minimize our expenses, one proxy statement and one annual report to shareholders may be delivered to two or more shareholders who share an address unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. We will deliver promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of the proxy statement and annual report to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the proxy statement and annual report was delivered. Requests for additional copies of the proxy statement and annual report, and requests that in the future separate documents be sent to shareholders who share an address, should be directed by writing to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Northwest Pipe Company, 5721 SE Columbia Way,201 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 200,100, Vancouver, Washington 9866198684 or by phone at (360) 397-6250.360‑397‑6250.

 

Q:

How can I revoke my proxy?

 

A:

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. In order to do this, you may do any of the following:

 

sign and return another proxy card bearing a later date;

sign and return another proxy card bearing a later date;

 

enter a new vote by Internet or by telephone following the instructions on the proxy card;

enter a new vote by Internet or by telephone following the instructions on the proxy card;

 

provide written notice of the revocation to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Northwest Pipe Company, 5721 SE Columbia Way, Suite 200, Vancouver, Washington 98661, prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting; or

provide written notice of the revocation to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Northwest Pipe Company, 201 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 100, Vancouver, Washington 98684, prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting; or

 

attend the meeting and vote in person. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you must obtain a legal proxy from your broker or other nominee authorizing you to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting.

attend the virtual meeting and electronically vote live via the Internet.

 

Q:

Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final results in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K8‑K filed by the Company within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

 


Q.

What happens if additional proposals are presented at the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

Other than the proposals described in this Proxy Statement, the Company does not expect any additional matters to be presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting. If you grant a proxy, the persons named as proxy holders, Scott Montross, the Company’s President and CEO, and Richard Roman, the Company’s ChairmanChairperson of the Board, will vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting in a manner directed by a majority of the Board of Directors.

 

Q:

Who will count the vote?

 

A:

Computershare, the Company’s transfer agent, has been appointed to act as the inspector of election andBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will tabulate the votes. Invotes and certify the event Computershare is unable to do so, a representative of the Company’s outside legal counsel, Ater Wynne LLP, will act in this role.results.

 

Q:

Is my vote confidential?

 

A:

Proxy cards, instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders are handled in a manner that protects your voting privacy. Your vote will not be disclosed either within the Company or to third parties except (1) as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements, (2) to allow for the tabulation of votes and certification of the vote, or (3) to facilitate a successful proxy solicitation by the Board of Directors. Occasionally, shareholders provide written comments on their proxy card, which are then forwarded to the Company’s management.

 

Q:

Who will bear the cost of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

The Company will pay the entire cost of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing, and distributing these proxy materials. In addition to the mailing of these proxy materials, the solicitation of proxies or votes may be made in person, by telephone, or by electronic communication by the Company’s directors, officers, and employees, who will not receive any additional compensation for such solicitation activities. The Company may also engage a proxy solicitation firm or other professional advisors to assist in the solicitation of proxies and provide related advice and support. In addition, the Company may reimburse brokerage firms and other persons representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to such beneficial owners.

 

34


 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

A copy of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20152020 Annual Report to Shareholders accompanies this Proxy Statement. The Company will provide, without charge, on the written request of any beneficial owner of shares of the Company’s Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, additional copies of the Company’s Annual Report. Written requests should be mailed to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, Northwest Pipe Company, 5721 SE Columbia Way,201 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 200,100, Vancouver, Washington 98661.98684.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

sig1.jpg

  

Scott Montross

President and Chief Executive Officer

Vancouver, Washington
April 18, 2016

Vancouver, Washington

43


April 12, 2021

 

35

 

card1.jpg


card2.jpg